Jeyaparpathy.R v. M/S.Tuticorin City Municipal Corporation

O R D E R Heard Mr. B.Rajesh Saravanan, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. N.Anandkumar, Learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties.

¶2Learned Counsel for Respondent, on instructions, states that the entire amount due under the impugned Demand Notice has been fully paid by the Petitioner. In view of the same, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has made an endorsement to that effect in the court record. In fine, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.

09.02.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes /No sj Note: Issue order copy by 27.02.2023

P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J. sj Dated : 09.02.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.02.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU and W.M.P. (MD) Nos.10507 to 10509 of 2021 R.Jeyaparpathy ... Petitioner Vs. M/s.Tuticorin City Municipal Corporation, Represented by its Commissioner, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District. ... Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issue of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned Demand Notice Dated 26.07.2021 with regard to Door No 172-C, Palayamkottai Road, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District issued by the Respondent and quash the same and thereby direct the respondents to make a fresh assessment over the property bearing Door No 172-C, Palayamkottai Road, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District, as per the Rules, with effect from the financial year of 2005-2006 within a time frame as may be fixed by this Honble Court. For Petitioner : Mr. B.Rajesh Saravanan For Respondent : Mr. N.Anandkumar Standing Counsel