- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 September 2023
- Bench
- D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 7483/2019
Judgment
O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner has circulated a letter requesting permission to withdraw the writ petition. As such, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
05.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet :Yes / No sji To
1.The Additional Chief Secretary/ Industry Commissioner cum Industries Commerce Director, SIDCO Building, 2nd Floor, Thiru.Vi.Ka.Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai-600 032.
2.The General Manager, District Industry Centre, Industrial Estate, Dindigul-3. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
, J.
sji
05.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY R.Alageshan ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Additional Chief Secretary/ Industry Commissioner cum Industries Commerce Director, SIDCO Building, 2nd Floor, Thiru.Vi.Ka.Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. 2.The General Manager, District Industry Centre, Industrial Estate, Dindigul-3. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.23047/ICN/2017, dated 21.03.2019 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to disburse the part of the petitioner's retirement benefits amount of Rs.60,883.76 with interest to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Guhan For Respondents : Mr.M.Ramesh Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.