- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 September 2023
- Bench
- S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 12693/2021
Judgment
ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that prayer sought for in this writ petition is infructuous. The submission is recorded.
¶3In view of the aforesaid submission, nothing survives for adjudication. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No Costs. Index : Yes / No
21.09.2023 Internet : Yes
ksa To
¶1The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam, Chennai.
¶2The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Integrated Complex of Registration Department, TNAU Nagar, Rajakampeeram, Y.Othakadai, Madurai 625 107.
¶3The Sub Registrar (District Registrar Cadre), Sub Registrar Office, Singanallur, Coimbatore.
¶4The District Registrar, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.
¶5The Special Deputy Collector (Stamps), Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar, I/c Special Deputy Collector, (Stamps), Sivagangai. S.SRIMATHY. J ksa W.P.(MD)No. 12693 of 2023
21.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD)No. 12693 of 2023 John Peter ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam, Chennai. 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Integrated Complex of Registration Department, TNAU Nagar, Rajakampeeram, Y.Othakadai, Madurai 625 107. 3. The Sub Registrar (District Registrar Cadre), Sub Registrar Office, Singanallur, Coimbatore. 4. The District Registrar, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 5. The Special Deputy Collector (Stamps), Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar, I/c Special Deputy Collector, (Stamps), Sivagangai. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the 5th respondent, dated 10.07.2021 in Ta.Pa.S. 2/304/2021 and quash the same and consequently direct the 5th respondent to refund a sum of Rs.2,31,020/- to the petitioner forthwith. For Petitioner : M/s.J.Anandkumar For Respondents : Mr.B.Saravanan, Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.