- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 June 2023
- Bench
- C.V. Karthikeyan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 9202/2023
Judgment
O R D E R It is stated that notice had been issued for enquiry on 03.07.2023. It is seen that the first respondent is proceeding in the manner known to law.
¶2Let me not enter into any detailed examination of the facts. However, a direction is given to the concerned respondent to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner on or before 31.10.2023.
¶3Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
12.06.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ssb To
1.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Madurai Region, Y.Othakadai, Madurai.
2.The District Registrar (Admin), Madurai South, Madurai.
C.V. KARTHIKEYAN, J. ssb
12.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN T.Jeyaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Madurai Region, Y.Othakadai, Madurai. 2.The District Registrar (Admin), Madurai South, Madurai. 3.M.Dhanasekaran 4.M.Jawahar ...Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to decide the appeal filed by the petitioner dated 23.12.2022 challenging the orders of the second respondent made in Na.Ka.No.4369/A2/2022 dated 14.02.2022 within the time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murali For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate for R1 and R2 No-appearance for R3 and R4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.