Thiraviyam v. The Tahsildar

O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that New Survey No. 1669/18, Old Survey No.1077/1B was already surveyed. However, he submits that survey was not conducted in respect of survey No.1669/19.

¶2Learned Government Advocate submits that Survey No. 1669/19 is classified as Arasu Poramboke.

¶3Since a survey was conducted in respect of New Survey No. 1669/18, nothing survives in the present writ petition. It is open to the petitioner to seek a survey in respect of Survey No.1669/19, but no opinion is expressed on the merits thereof.

¶4Therefore, W.P.(MD).No.7624 of 2023 is dismissed as infructuous without any order as to costs.

05.04.2023 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sbn To The Tahsildar, Rajapalayam Taluk Office, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. sbn

05.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :05.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Thiraviyam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Rajapalayam Taluk Office, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District. 2.Murugan 3.Pitchai ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to measure the property in New S.No.1669/18, Old S.No.1077/1B and demark the public pathway on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 23.03.2023. For Petitioner :Mr.S.Chamundi Bose For Respondents :Mr.N.Muthuvijayan Special Government Pleader for R1