- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 March 2023
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- SA(MD) 285/2022
Judgment
JUDGMENT The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the respondent has already taken possession of the suit schedule property and therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in this second appeal.
¶2Recording the said statement, this Second Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
13.03.2023 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No Sm TO:
1.The District Munsif Court, Ramanathapuram.
2.The Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Ramanathapuram.
3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
sm Dated:
13.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and C.M.P.(MD)No.3719 of 2022 P.A.K.Sathiyanarayanan ... Appellant /Vs./ Shencottai C.S.I.Segara Committee, Rep. by its President, Having Office at C.S.I.Church Compound, Shencottai, Shencottai Taluk. ... Respondent P RAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 04.12.2021 made in A.S.No.27 of 2018 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Tenkasi, confirming the judgment and decree dated 24.01.2018 made in O.S.No.61 of 2013 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Shencottai, by allowing the present second appeal. For Appellant : Mr.S.Sundarapandian For Respondent : Mr.P.P.Alwin Balan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.