VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Murugan v. The Inspector of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
1 March 2023
Bench
A.D.Jagadish Chandiraauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 3693/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the First day of March Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL OP(MD). No.3693 of 2023 Murugan ... Petitioner/Accused No.6

Vs The State rep by, The Inspector of Police, Valliyoor Police Station, Tirunelveli District In Crime No.141 of 2006 ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vijayakumar For Respondent : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.141 of 2006 on the file of the respondent police in C.C.No.348 of 2008 on the Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest pursuant to issuance of Non Bailable Warrant in Crime No.141 of 2006 in C.C.No.348 of 2008 on the Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an accused in C.C.No.348 of 2008 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, and the case was posted for trial on

23.05.2016 and on that day, since the petitioner is unable to attend the Court, the learned Magistrate has issued Non Bailable Warrant of against him. He prays for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶3The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the petitioner has been absconding from 23.05.2016 and due to that the trial is pending. He would also submit that the option available to the petitioner is to appear before the court and file an application to recall Non Bailable Warrant and he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶4Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, a direction is issued to the petitioner to surrender before the trial court and file an application to recall Non Bailable Warrant and on such application being filed, the learned Magistrate is directed to consider and pass orders on the same day by considering the merits of the case. This petition is disposed of accordingly. sd/- 01/03/2023 / TRUE COPY / /03/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. CM TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALIYOOR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 2 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VALLIYOOR. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S.VIJAYAKUMAR S Advocate SR.No.3138 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.3693 of 2023 Date :01/03/2023 SI/ /SAR-1/(08.03.2023) 2P/5C

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.