VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Chitrarasu v. The Inspector of Police

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 February 2023
Bench
A.D.Jagadish Chandiraauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 3657/2023

Judgment

O R D E R The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 341 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.51 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution, as per the de-facto complainant, is that on 18.02.2023, due to a wordy quarrel, the petitioner has abused the de-facto complainant in filthy language and also assaulted her with dire consequences. Hence, the case.

3.The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and a false complaint has been given. He would also submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence, as alleged by the prosecution. He would also submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions, that may be imposed on him. Hence, he would pray for anticipatory bail for the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that on 18.02.2023, due to a wordy quarrel, the petitioner has abused the de-facto complainant in filthy language and also assaulted her with dire consequences. He would object for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. CRL.O.P(MD)No.3657 of 2023

5.Taking into consideration the facts and submissions and also on perusing the materials available on record including the F.I.R., this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thottiyam, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, every Saturday at 10.30 am until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC. sd/- 24/02/2023 / TRUE COPY / /03/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. cmr To 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOTTIYAM. CRL.O.P(MD)No.3657eofe2023 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THOTTIYAM POLICE STATION TRICHY DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +2 CC to M/s.K.ARUNRAJ, Advocate ( SR-2876[I] dated 24/02/2023, SR-2977[I] dated 28/02/2023 ) ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.3657 of 2023 Date :24/02/2023 RS//SAR-2(07.03.2023) 3P 7C

Case details

Parties and counsel

CRL.O.P(MD)No.3657 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.02.2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL.O.P(MD)No.3657 of 2023 Chitrarasu ... Petitioner/Sole Accused -vs- State represented by The Inspector of Police, Thottiyam Police Station, Trichy District. (in Cr.No.51 of 2023) ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent Police with respect to Cr.No.51 of 2023. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Arunraj, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.Albert James Government Advocate (Crl.side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.