- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 15 December 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 4529/2021
Judgment
O R D E R When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that nothing survives in this Writ Petition and the same has become infructuous.
¶2Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs.
15.12.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no Nsr To
1.The Registrar of Registration, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
2.The Sub Registrar, The Sub Registrar Office, Murappanadu, Thoothukudi District.
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. Nsr
15.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH S.Thangapandi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Registrar of Registration, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2.The Sub Registrar, The Sub Registrar Office, Murappanadu, Thoothukudi District. 3.V.K.Subbaiah ... Respondents (R-3 is impleaded vide Court Order dated 19.04.2021 in WMP(MD)No.5919 of 2021 in WP(MD)No.4529 of 2021) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned rejection order RFL/Murappanadu/41/2020 dated 10.11.2020 passed by the second respondent as which is contrary to the Statute and quash the same and also direct the second respondent to register the petitioner's Settlement Deed dated 03.09.2020 immediately. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Rajiv Rufus For R-1 and R-2 : Mr.A.K.Manikkam Special Government Pleader For R-3 : Mr.P.Senthoorpandi
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.