VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Raju Spinning Mills Private Limited v. The Assistant General Manager / Branch Head State Bank of India

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
4 February 2026
Bench
R.Vijayakumarauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 3173/2026

Judgment

ORDER The present writ petition has been filed by a Private Limited Company engaged in the business of spinning cotton and blended fibres which is duly registered as Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises(MEME) under the provision of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006. The petitioner has availed working capital demand loan and also GECL term loan facility from the respondent Bank. There was default in re-payment of the above said loan. So far, the petitioner's loan account has not been classified as non-performing assets. As on today, it is classified only as SMA-02 reflecting incipient and remediable stress and no recovery proceedings have been initiated.

¶2In the light of the above said circumstances, the petitioner Mill has given a representation to the respondents on 27.12.2025.

¶3According to the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, the Rehabilitation Scheme has to be placed before the Committee of stressed MSME and they have to arrive at a finding before declaring the account as NPA.

¶4The learned Senior Counsel relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in (2024) 10 SCC 292, Pro Knits Vs. Board of Directors of Canara Bank and Others and submitted that the Rehabilitation Scheme is a statutory nature in view of Sections 9 and 10 of MSME Act, 2006.

¶5The learned Senior Counsel further submitted that the respondents herein have to constitute the Committee on a case to case basis with the domain experts. So far, the Committee has not been constituted despite the fact that the representations have been addressed only on 27.12.2025 and therefore, the petitioner apprehends that it is likely to be declared as NPA and other recovery proceedings are likely to follow. Hence, the present writ petition.

¶6Considering the limited prayer sought for in the writ petition, the respondents herein are directed to constitute the committee for Revival and Rehabilitation of MSME with regard to the petitioner Mill and the said Committee is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated

27.12.2025 and take a decision within a period of 8(eight) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Till such time, any coercive steps shall be kept in abeyance.

¶7With the above said observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

04.02.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR To

¶1The Assistant General Manager/ Branch Head State Bank of India, Commercial Branch, 2nd Floor, 7-A, West Veli Street, Madurai - 625 001.

¶2The Board of Directors of State Bank of India, Represented by its Managing Director, Regional Office, Madhuram Complex No.2, Ambedkar Road, Madurai - 625 002. R.VIJAYAKUMAR

, J.

RJR W.P.(MD)No.3173 of 2026

04.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.02.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR W.P.(MD)No.3173 of 2026 and W.M.P(MD)No.2622 of 2026 Raju Spinning Mills Private Limited, Represented by its Director, Mr.K.B.Abinanthan, ...Petitioner Vs 1. The Assistant General Manager/ Branch Head State Bank of India, Commercial Branch, 2nd Floor, 7-A, West Veli Street, Madurai - 625 001. 2. The Board of Directors of State Bank of India, Represented by its Managing Director, Regional Office, Madhuram Complex No.2, Ambedkar Road, Madurai - 625 002. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the State Bank of India to consider and dispose of the Petitioner's representation dated 27.12.2025 by placing the same before the appropriate Committee for Stressed / Distressed Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), constituted under the Framework for Revival and Rehabilitation of MSMEs dated 29.05.2015, within a time bound period to be fixed by this Court, and consequently direct the Board of Directors of the State Bank of India to forthwith constitute such Committee, if not already constituted, and further direct the said Committee to consider and decide the petitioner's application for reconstructing strictly in accordance with the aforesaid notification dated 29.05.2015 and the relevant circulars, guidelines and regulations issued by the Reserve Bank of India. For Petitioner : M/s.Isaac Mohanlal Senior Counsel for Mr.B.Ramachandran

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.