K. Ganesan v. The Commissioner

ORDER Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has made an endorsement in the court record stating that the relief sought in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration at this stage. In fine, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

06.02.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No pkn To

¶1The Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Nungambakkam, Chennai.

¶2The Joint Commissioner/ Executive Officer, Arulmigu Meenashi Amman Temple, Madurai. P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J. PKN

06.02.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.02.2023 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU K.Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Nungambakkam, Chennai. 2. The Joint Commissioner/ Executive Officer, Arulmigu Meenashi Amman Temple, Madurai. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the First Respondent dated 03.01.2020 in proceedings R.C.No.6988/2019D2, set aside the same, as the same is arbitrary, ultravires and consequently direct the First Respondent to number and entertain the appeal filed by the Petitioner u/s 43 of Act 22/1959 challenging the order dated 01.07.2007 passed by the Second Respondent. For Petitioner : Mr. R.G.Shankar Ganesh For Respondents : Mr. P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader for R1 Mr. V.R.Shanmuganathan for R2