Anwar Baig v. Kairunnissa

JUDGMENT It is reported by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant died and so far, the legal representatives of the appellant have not come forward to implead themselves, which shows that they have not interested in pursuing this appeal by impleading themselves. Therefore, this Court has no other option except to dismiss this appeal as abated. Accordingly, this Second Appeal stands dismissed as abated. No costs.

11.09.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Yuva To

1.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli.

2.The Principal District Munsif, Tiruchirappalli.

3.The Record Keeper, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

, J.

Yuva

11.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Anwar Baig ... Appellant / Appellant / Plaintiff -Vs- 1.Kairunnissa 2.Akthar 3.Iqbal 4.Swokath 5.Ashraf 6.Raheema Bee 7.Ummasalma 8.Kaleellur Rahman 9.Haabur Rahman 10.Mujibunnissa 11.Akbar Ali ... Respondents / Respondents / Defendants PRAYER : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the judgment and decree of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli, dated 07.10.2004 made in A.S.No.226 of 2003, confirming the judgment and decree of the learned Principal District Munsif, Tiruchirappalli, dated 04.08.2003 made in O.S.No.2668 of 1996. For Appellant : Mr.T.M.Hariharan For Respondents : No Appearance