- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 23 August 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA(MD) 544/2005
Judgment
J U D G M E N T The first respondent has passed away on 11.06.2019. However, till date no steps have been taken to implead the legal heirs of the deceased first respondent. Further, this appeal was dismissed for default as against the respondents 2 to 4, vide order dated 02.03.2022. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.
23.08.2023 akv To
1.The Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli.
2.The Principal District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli.
3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
,J.
akv
23.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Ramalakshmi ... Appellant Vs. 1.Petchiammal 2.Gomathinayagam 3.Peratchi 4.Subbulakshmi ... Respondents PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.129 of 1992 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli dated 30.10.2003, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.171 of 1989 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli dated 09.09.1992. For Appellant : Mr.M.P.Senthil For Respondents : Mr.S.Kumar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.