- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 August 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA(MD) 496/2005
Judgment
J U D G M E N T The sole respondent has passed away on 22.07.2014 and a Memo also filed by the learned counsel for the respondent to that effect on 25.09.2014. However, till date no steps have been taken to bring on record the LRs. of the deceased sole respondent. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.
18.08.2023 akv To
1.The Sub Court, Ambasamuthram.
2.The Additional District Munsif Court, Ambasamuthram.
3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
,J.
akv
18.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY 1.Bootha Thevar (died) 2.Palaniachi Ammal 3.Papanasam 4.Arumugam 5.Sundaram 6.Muthulakshmi 7.Sornam Appellants 2 to 7 are brought on record as LRs. of the deceased sole appellant vide order dated 25.04.2016 made in M.P.(MD).Nos.1 to 3 of 2011 in S.A.(MD).No.496 of 2005. ... Appellants Vs. 1.Ramakrishna Thevar 2.Muthu Lakshmi (died) R1 is recorded as LR of the deceased second respondent. Memo recorded. Memo USR.No.(Not given) dated 22.02.2011 vide order dated 10.08.2012 made in S.A.(MD).No.496 of 2005. ... Respondents PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.62 of 2004, dated 08.04.2005 on the file of the Sub Court, Ambasamuthram, confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.120 of 2001, dated 24.03.2004, on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Ambasamuthram. For Appellants : Mr.S.Kumar For R1 : Mr.C.Selvakumar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.