S. Palanichamy Goundar, v. The President,

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE] Heard Mr.R.Surianarayanan, learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the respondent.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had submitted application for approval of the building plan on 01.04.2010 and 05.01.2012. However, the same is not decided.

¶3Ten years have lapsed, after the Writ Petition has been filed. The said applications may have been decided. In case, the said applications are not decided, then, the same may be decided in accordance with law, preferably, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order passed by this Court. However, if the applications are already decided, then, this order may not operate against the respondents.

¶4Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. [S.V.G., C.J.] [L.V.G., J.]

30.11.2023 Index : Yes / No

RM To The President, Pulikutthy Village Panchayat, Pulikutthy, Theni District. THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE and L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J . RM

30.11.2023 ____________https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.11.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI S.Palanichamy Goundar ... Petitioner Vs. The President, Pulikutthy Village Panchayat, Pulikutthy, Theni District. ... Respondent PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to approve the petitioner's building plan for the shopping complex constructed in S.No.92/2AL in Pulikutthy Village in Theni District, by disposing the petitioner's applications dated 01.04.2010 and 05.01.2012 which are pending before him. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Surianarayanan For Respondent : No Appearance