- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 25 August 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA(MD) 132/2005
Judgment
J U D G M E N T When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants would submit that the third appellant passed away and no one come forward to provide the details of the legal representatives of the deceased third appellant. Further, the other appellants also not provided any instruction. Therefore, he has filed a memo, dated 25.08.2023, stating that he has no instruction from the appellants. It appears that the appellants have no interest in prosecuting the case. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
25.08.2023 akv To
1.The Principal District Judges Court, Thanjavur.
2.The District Munsif Court, Thiruvayyaru.
3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
,J.
akv S.A.(MD).No.132 of 2005
25.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.A.(MD).No132 of 2005 1.Selvanayaki 2.Saravanan 3.Ganesan Udayar ... Appellants Vs. 1.Singu Nattar 2.Rengaraj Nattar 3.R.Viruthambal 4.Porulkodi 5.R.Kennedy 6.R.Saminayagam 7.R.Chitra 8.Shanmugam ... Respondents PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the decree and judgment of the Principal District Judges Court, Thanjavur passed in A.S.No.124 of 2003, dated 10.11.2004, reversing the decree and judgment of the District Munsif Court, Thiruvayyaru passed in O.S.No.119 of 2003, dated 30.06.2003. For Appellants : Mr.V.K.Vijayaraghavan For R1, R2 & R4 to R7 : Mr.R.Rajaraman
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.