R.M.Palaniappan v. Umayal Achi

J U D G M E N T The appellant as well as both the respondents have passed away. However, till date no steps have been taken to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased appellant as well as the deceased respondents. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.

16.08.2023 akv To

1.The Principal Sub Judge, Dindigul.

2.The Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul.

3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

,J.

akv S.A.(MD).No.247 of 2006

16.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY R.M.Palaniappan ... Appellant Vs. 1.Umayal Achi 2.N.Chidambaram ... Respondents PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 21.12.2005 in A.S.No.417 of 2004 passed by the learned Principal Sub Judge, Dindigul, reversing the judgment and decree dated 19.04.2000 in O.S.No.697 of 1998 passed by the learned Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul. For Appellant : Mr.T.Antony Arulraj For Respondents : No appearance