- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 1 September 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA(MD) 599/2012
Judgment
JUDGMENT On 15.02.2018, it was reported before this Court that the respondent died. But, so far no steps have been taken by the appellant to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased respondent. Therefore, this second appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
01.09.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order TM To
1.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul.
2.The District Munsif, Vedasandur.
3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
, J.
TM
01.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2012 1.Dhuraipandi 2.Meenatchi 3.Banumathi ...Appellants/Appellants/Defendants 3 to 5 vs. Binnaiammal ... Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff. Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 19.04.2012 in A.S.No. 131 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Dindigul, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 31.08.2010 in O.S.No.207 of 1998 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Vedasandur. For Appellants : Mr.A.Arumugam For Respondent : Mr.M.R.Sreenivasan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.