- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 1 September 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA(MD) 1129/2008
Judgment
JUDGMENT When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the sole appellant passed away as well as the sole respondent also passed away on 10.07.2018. But, their legal heirs are not come forward to implead themselves and proceed with the case. Therefore, this second appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
01.09.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order TM To
1.The Subordinate Judge, Devakottai.
2.The District Munsif, Devakottai.
3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
, J.
TM
01.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2008 P.Ramanathan ... Appellant/Appellant/Defendant vs. P.Amirthavalli ... Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 11.12.2007 in A.S.No. 40 of 2007 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Devakottai, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 24.08.2007 in O.S.No.11 of 2007 on the file of the District Munsif, Devakottai. For Appellants : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.B.Muruganandham
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.