VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

O.A.A.Anantha Padmanaban v. M.Singaram

DISMISSED AS ABATED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 August 2023
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
SA(MD) 1123/2008

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY In S.A.(MD)No.1123 of 2008 O.A.A.Anantha Padmanaban Chettiar ...Appellant vs. M.Singaram ...Respondent Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 14.12.2007 in A.S.No. 80 of 2005 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Thiruchirappalli confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 05.04.2005 in O.S.No.292 of 1997 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Thiruchirappalli. For Appellant : Mr.R.Devaraj For Respondent : No appearance In S.A.(MD)No.947 of 2008 O.A.A.Anantha Padmanaban Chettiar ...Appellant vs. M.Singaram Chettiar ...Respondent Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 14.12.2007 in A.S.No. 74 of 2005 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Thiruchirappalli reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 05.04.2005 in O.S.No.292 of 1997 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Thiruchirappalli. For Appellant : Mr.R.Devaraj For Respondent : No appearance COMMON JUDGMENT The sole appellant and the sole respondent in both appeals passed away long before. The learned counsel for the appellant filed petitions to condone the delay, set aside the abatement and bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased appellant and respondent in both appeals.

¶2This court by virtue of order dated 27.06.2023, allowed the petitions filed in both appeals to condone the delay with condition to pay cost. Since the conditional order was not complied with, this Court, by virtue of order dated 14.07.2023 dismissed all the petitions which were filed for taking steps for the deceased appellant and the respondent in both the appeals.

¶3In view of the above, the Second Appeals are dismissed as abated. No costs.

08.08.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To

1.The Subordinate Judge, Thiruchirappalli

2.The Principal District Munsif, Thiruchirappalli

3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. S.A.(MD)Nos.1123oofo2008o&o947oofo2008 oKRISHNANoRAMASAMYoo,oJo. mbi ooooooooooooooooo S.A.(MD)Nos.1123oofo2008o&o947oofo2008

08.08.2023 Pageo4oofo4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.