Pillayar v. C. Thonthiappan

JUDGMENT The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the sole appellant passed away on 07.06.2016.

¶2Though the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the sole appellant died long before, till date, he has not taken any steps to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.

08.08.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To

1.The Sub Judge, Srivilliputhur

2.The Additional District Munsif, Srivilliputhur

3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

, J.

mbi

08.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Pillayar ...Appellant vs. C.Thonthiappan ... Respondent Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 20.02.2006 in A.S.No. 14 of 2002 on the file of the Sub Court, Srivilliputhur reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 19.02.2002 in O.S.No.175 of 1999 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Srivilliputhur. For Appellant : Mr.M.Jothi Basu For Respondent : Mr.C.Mahadevan for Mr.S.Balakarthick