- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 July 2026
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- WP 24914/2026
Judgment
Order This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned refusal check slip and seeking a further direction to the respondent to register the petitioner's Settlement Deed presented on 16.06.2026. Page2 of 4
¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the subject property is situated in Dharmapuri District and Taluk, Papinaickanahalli Village, in S.F. No. 127/2A1A1A1, measuring an extent of 1,200 sq. ft. The said property originally belonged to the petitioner's father, who had bequeathed it, along with other properties, vide an unregistered Will dated 11.05.2017. Based on the Will, following the demise of his father, the petitioner has been in complete possession and enjoyment of the property. On the strength of the said Will, the petitioner executed a Settlement Deed in favour of his daughter and presented it for registration. However, the respondent, vide the impugned order dated 16.06.2026, refused to register the Settlement Deed on the ground that the Will submitted by the petitioner is unregistered. Challenging the said impugned order, the present Writ Petition has been filed.
¶3The learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that if the document is re-presented, the respondent will conduct an enquiry by issuing notice to the other legal heirs and thereafter register the same in accordance with law.
¶4Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that the rejection of the registration merely on the ground that the Will is unregistered, as submitted by the learned Government Counsel, is improper. Page3 of 4 The respondent can very well conduct an enquiry with the siblings of the petitioner and any other rightful owners or legal heirs entitled to a share after the demise of the petitioner's father. Therefore, the impugned order is liable to be quashed.
¶6In view of the above, the impugned order passed by the respondent dated 16.06.2026 is quashed, and the petitioner is directed to re-present the Settlement Deed for registration. Upon receipt of the same, the respondent is directed to register the Settlement Deed in accordance with law, after issuing due notice to all the parties concerned. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶7Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above directions. No costs. 03-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order SK to The Sub Registrar RFL/2 Joint Sub Registrar office Dharmapuri WPoNo.o24914oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. sk WPoNo.o24914oofo2026 03-07-2026 Page4oofo4
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY K.Baskaran s/O.Kuppusamy No.240,Thammannan Road Veeran Nilam Salem 636 009 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Sub Registrar RFL/2 Joint Sub Registrar office Dharmapuri ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records connected with the impugned order passed by the respondent dated 16.6.2026 in refusal check slip in RFL/No.2 Joint Sub Registrar Dharmapuri /65/2026 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to register the petitioners settlement Deed presented on 16.6.2026 and pass For Petitioner(s): Mr.Franckelin.S For Respondent(s): Mr.DOMINIC S.DAVID, Government Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.