- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 8 November 2024
- Bench
- G. Jayachandran
- Case no.
- OP 178/2021
Judgment
ORDER This Original Petition has been filed under Section 232 and 276 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (Act No.XXXIX of 1925) to grant Letters of Administration under Section XXV, Rule 5 of the Original Side Rules in respect of the last Will and Testament of G.Venkatesa Achari, who died on
23.12.1996.
¶2During his lifetime, G.Venkatesa Achari has purchased the schedule mentioned property by way of a sale deed in the year 1980 and in respect of that property, he had executed a Will dated 01.06.1995 in favour of his grand son D.Yukeshwaran, S/o Dilli. The said Will been duly registered at Sub Registrar Office, Sembium as Doc.No.101 in Book-III.
¶3The said Will was attested by two persons namely (i)S.Vinayagam and (ii)Samuvel. The Testator G.Venkatesa Achari died on 23.12.1996 leaving behind his wife, two sons and two daughters by name (1) Amirthammal, (2)V.Nagalingam, (3)V.Dilli, (4)Kousalaya (Deceased)
(4)Kamala. His wife Amirthammal died on 08.06.2000. In his Will, he reserved the right and interest of the schedule mentioned property to his wife and absolute interest to his grandson, who is petitioner herein.
¶4On the death of Amirthammal, the petitioner been vested with absolute right over the property under the Will and therefore, he has filed this petition to grant Letters of Administration.
¶5To substantiate his claim, the petitioner has examined himself as PW-1 and marked the following nine documents as Ex.P1 to Ex.P9. Sl. No. Exhibits Documents
¶1Ex.P1 Original registered Will and Testament dated
01.06.1995 executed by Mr.M.G.Venkatesa Achari.
¶2Ex.P2 Original Death Certificate of Mr.M.G.Venkatesa Achari
¶3Ex.P3 Original Death Certificate of Mrs.Amirthammal
¶4Ex.P4 Computer Generated Legal Heirship Certificate of Mr.M.G.Venkatesa Achari.
¶5Ex.P5 Photocopy of the property Tax demand Card stands in the name of Mrs.Amirthammal
¶6Ex.P6 Affidavit of Assets showing the Net Value of the estate as Rs.9,99,000/-
¶7Ex.P7 Copy of the Paper publication effected in one issue of Tamil Daily "Makkal Kural" dated 08.07.2024.
¶8Ex.P8 Copy of the Paper publication effected in one issue of English Daily "Trinity Mirror"dated 15.07.2024.
¶9Ex.P9 Certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
¶6Since the whereabouts of both the attesting witnesses is not traceable, one Mr.B.Rajendran, S/o Mr.Batcha Achari, who is the brother's son of Testator Venkatesa Achari was examined as PW-2. He has spoken about his acquaintance with the signature of Venkatesa Achari. Notice sent to the attesting witnesses returned with endorsement 'no such person' and the returned covers along with affidavit of service marked as Ex.P10. The affidavit of PW-2 regarding his acquaintance with the signature of testator being his paternal uncle, is marked as Ex.P11. Adhar Card of the witness is marked as Ex.P12.
¶7Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 equivalent to Section 67 of Bharatiya Sakshiya Adhiniyam, 2023, say that to prove the documents which requires by law to be attested, atleast one of the attesting witness to be called for the purpose of proving its execution.
¶8If no such attesting witness can be found, it must be proved that the attestation of one attesting witness at least is in his handwriting and that the signature of the person executing the document is in the handwriting of that person.
¶9In the case in hand, by examining PW-2, who is well acquaintance with the signature of the testator, the petitioner has satisfied the second limb of Section 68 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, which is equivalent to Section 69 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
¶10Regarding the proof of the attesting witnesses, notice sent to the attesting witnesses were returned with endorsement 'no such person' in the address. This fact is proved by marking Ex.P10 (series) through PW-2. The first limb of Section 69 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, which is equivalent to Section 68 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 could not be complied, in view of the fact that the whereabouts of these two attesting witnesses is not known.
¶11In the given circumstances, if the Will is not propounded, the parties to be entitled for the property of the late Venkatesa Achari will be his two sons and two daughters, they are arrayed as respondents 1 to 4. They have no objection for grant of Letters of Administration in favour of the petitioner admitting the execution of the Will.
¶12Notice sent to respondents 1 and 2 served. Notice sent to respondents 3 and 4 returned as 'unserved'. Since the 3rd respondent was reported dead, notice sent to the 5th respondent, who is the son of the deceased 3rd respondent, was returned as unserved with endorsement 'no such person'. The paper publication effected in one issue of Tamil daily 'Makkal Kural' and one issue of English daily 'Trinity Mirror' on 08.07.2024 and 15.07.2024 respectively. The copy of the paper publication marked as Ex.P7 and Ex.P8. Despite paper publication, no objection received from the public or any person, who have right or interest in the property.
¶13Taking into consideration of these facts cumulatively, this Court is of the view that Letter of Administration can be granted to the petitioner herein, who being the grand son of the testator and the probable legal heirs put to notice and no objection received from them. As a result,
(i)This Original Petition is allowed and Letters of Administration to be issued in accordance with Rules. Such Letters of Administration shall have effect throughout the State of Tamil Nadu.
(ii)The petitioner is directed to execute a security bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) in the name of the Assistant Registrar (Original Side-II) of this Court.
(iii)The petitioner is further directed to file an inventory of assets and statement of accounts within a period of six months and one year respectively.
08.11.2024 Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no Speaking Order/Non Speaking order ari Petitioner's witness:- PW-1:Mr.D.Yukeswaran PW-2:Mr.B.Rajendran Documents marked:- Ex.P1 Original registered Will and Testament dated 01.06.1995 executed by Mr.M.G.Venkatesa Achari. Ex.P2 Original Death Certificate of Mr.M.G.Venkatesa Achari Ex.P3 Original Death Certificate of Mrs.Amirthammal Ex.P4 Computer Generated Legal Heirship Certificate of Mr.M.G.Venkatesa Achari. Ex.P5 Photocopy of the property Tax demand Card stands in the name of Mrs.Amirthammal Ex.P6 Affidavit of Assets showing the Net Value of the estate as Rs.9,99,000/- Ex.P7 Copy of the Paper publication effected in one issue of Tamil Daily "Makkal Kural" dated 08.07.2024. Ex.P8 Copy of the Paper publication effected in one issue of English Daily "Trinity Mirror"dated 15.07.2024. Ex.P9 Certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Ex.P10 The signatures found in Ex.P1 Will are that of PW-2's paternal uncle Mr.g.Venkatesa Achari. Ex.P11 Affidavit of PW-2 Ex.P12 Photocopy of PW-2 Aadhar Card
08.11.2024 DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J. ari delivery Order made in
08.11.2024
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on :05.11.2024 Pronounced on :08.11.2024 Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN ORIGINAL PETITION NO.178 OF 2021 D.Yukeshwaran (Amended as per the order of the Hon'ble High Court dated 08.11.2023 in A.No.185/2023) .. Petitioner /versus/ 1.V.Nagalingam 2.V.Dilli 3.Kousalya(deceased) 4.Kamala 5.Kumar (brought on record as 5th respondent as LR of deceased 3rd respondent Kousalya by the Hon'ble Court in A.No.466/2022 by order dated 10.02.2022) .. Respondents Prayer: Original Petition has been filed under Section 232 and 276 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (Act No.XXXIX of 1925) for issue of Probate under Section XXV, Rule 5 of the Original Side Rules to grant Letters of Administration with the Will annexed to him as the grandson/sole beneficiary under the said Will of the said deceased having effect limited to the State of Tamil Nadu. For Petitioner :Mr.S.Shyamala For R1,R2, R4 :Mr.V.Haritha R5-No appearance R3-died -----
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.