- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 22 January 2024
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- CMA 1285/2023
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:22.01.2024 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Lanika Aafrin, Minor (Represented by her father and next friend Noorul Sheik) No.32, Arul Nagar, Kattupakkam, Chennai-600 06. .. Appellant in C.M.A.No.1285 of 2023 Noorjahan .. Appellant in C.M.A.No.1286 of 2023 ..Vs.. The Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd (MTC) Pallavan Saslai, Chennai-2. .. Respondent in both C.M.A.'s Prayer in both C.M.A.'s: These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree dated 27.02.2023 made in M.C.O.P.Nos.2646 and 6751 of 2018, on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, IV Court of Small Causes, Chennai. For Appellants : Mr.R.Mohan Babu (in both C.M.A.'s) For Respondents : Mr.M.Murali Vinodh (in both C.M.A.'s) *** C O M M O N J U D G M E N T Since the claim pertains to very same accident, these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are taken up together and disposed of vide this common judgment.
¶2These Appeals have been filed by the Appellants/Claimants, challenging the Award dated 27.02.2023 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, IV Court of Small Causes, Chennai in M.C.O.P.Nos.2646 and 6751 of 2018 respectively.
¶3The Appellants are the Claimants in M.C.O.P.Nos.2646 and 6751 of 2018 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, IV Court of Small Causes, Chennai. They filed the above said claim petition, claiming a sum of Rs.6,00,000/- and Rs.1,00,000/- respectively as compensation in respect of the injuries sustained by them, in an accident that occurred on 24.02.2018.
4.The Tribunal, considering the pleadings, oral and documentary evidence, held that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of the bus bearing Registration No.TN-01-N-4703, belonging to the Respondent-Transport Corporation and directed the Respondent-Transport Corporation to pay a sum of Rs. 91,500/- and Rs.25,000/- to the Claimants respectively.
5.Not being satisfied with the amount awarded by the Tribunal, the Appellants have come out with the present appeals seeking enhancement of compensation.
6.The learned counsel for the Appellants contended that due to the aforesaid accident, claimant in M.C.O.P.No.2646 of 2018, sustained grievous injuries, for which she was hospitalized for 17 days and two surgeries were done and though the Doctor assessed partial permanent disability @ 30% , the Tribunal without considering the same, has fixed the disability only @ 5%. He further submitted that considering the nature of injuries, the Tribunal ought to have awarded compensation towards Future Medical Expenses and the compensation awarded by the Tribunal under other heads is also very low and the same needs to be enhanced.
¶7As far as Claimant in M.C.O.P.No.6751 of 2018 is concerned, the learned counsel appearing for the Appellant/Claimant submitted that the Tribunal without considering the medical records filed, has awarded a sum of Rs.25,000/- as comepensation which is very low and therefore prays for enhancement.
8.Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent-Transport Corporation contended that the Tribunal on considering the oral and documentary evidence has rightly awarded compensation to both the Appellants/Claimants and the Appellants have not made out the case for enhancement. However, he fairly admitted that the disability fixed by the Tribunal is very low and 20% may be fixed as disability.
9.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants as well as the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent-Transport Corporation and perused the entire materials on record.
¶10As far as Appellant in C.M.A.No.1285 of 2023, who is the Claimant in M.C.O.P.No.2646 of 2018 is concerned, the Claimant who is a minor sustained multiple injuries and fractures and was hospitalized for 17 days and though P.W.3-Doctor has asssessed disability @ 30%, the Tribunal taking note of the fact that the assessment was not done by Medical Board has fixed disability only @ 5%, which in the opinion of this Court is very low and therefore, this Court deems it fit to fix the disability @ 22%. Accordingly, the disability with respect to the injuries sustained by the Appellant is fixed @ 22% and by taking 5,000/- per percentage, a sum of Rs.1,10,000/- is awarded under the head Disability. Considering the nature of injuries sustained, a sum of Rs.25,000/- is awarded towards Future Medical Expenses.
¶11The amounts awarded by the Tribunal under other heads are just and reasonable and hence, the same are hereby confirmed. Thus, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is re-determined as follows: S. N o Description Amount awarded by Tribunal
(Rs) Amount awarded by this Court
(Rs) Award confirmed or enhanced, reduced or granted
¶1Disability 25,000/- 1,10,000/- Enhanced
¶2Medical Expenses 10,838/- 10,838/- Confirmed
¶3Pain and Suffering 20,000/- 20,000/- Confirmed
¶4Transportation Expenses 5,000/- 5,000/- Confirmed
¶5Nutrition Expenses 10,000/- 10,000/- Confirmed
¶6Damages to Clothes 2,000/-2,000/-Confirmed Attender charges 8,500/-8,500/-Confirmed Future Medical Expenses 25,000/-25,000/-Granted Loss of Amenities 10,000/-10,000/-Confirmed Total Rs.91,338/-Rs.91,500/-(Rounded off) Rs.2,01,338/-Rs.2,01,500/-(Rounded off) Enhanced by Rs.1,10,000/-
¶12As far as C.M.A.No.1286 of 2023 is concerned, this Court is of the view that the comensation awarded by the Tribunal to the claimant under various heads is very low and therefore the overall compensation awarded by the Tribunal is enhanced from Rs.25,000/-to Rs.30,000/-
¶13In the result:
(a) C.M.A.No. 1285 of 2023 is partly allowed and the compensation awarded by the Tribunal at Rs.91,500/- is hereby enhanced to Rs.2,01,500/- together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till the date of deposit. The Respondent-Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the award amount now determined by this Court, along with interest and costs, less the amount already deposited, if any, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment to the credit of M.C.O.P.No.2646 of 2018 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, IV Court of Small Causes, Chennai. On such deposit being made, as the Appellant/Claimant is a minor, the Tribunal is directed to deposit the compensation amount in any one of the nationalized banks under the Fixed Deposit scheme, till she attains majority and her father, who is the natural guardian is entitled to withdraw the interest once in three months and utilise the same for the welfare of the minor claimant.
(b) C.M.A.No. 1286 of 2023 is partly allowed and the compensation awarded by the Tribunal at Rs.25,000/- is hereby enhanced to Rs.30,000/- together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till the date of deposit. The Respondent-Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the award amount now determined by this Court, along with interest and costs, less the amount already deposited, if any, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment to the credit of M.C.O.P.No.6751 of 2018 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, IV Court of Small Causes, Chennai. On such deposit being made, the Tribunal is directed to transfer the amount, directly to the Bank account of the Appellant/Claimant through RTGS, within a period of three weeks thereafter.
¶14The Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are allowed in part in the aforesaid terms. The appellants/claimants shall pay necessary Court fee, if any, on the enhanced compensation. No costs.
22.01.2024 arr Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No To
¶1The Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd (MTC) Pallavan Saslai, Chennai-2.
2.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, IV Court of Small Causes, Chennai.
3.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. arr
22.01.2024
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.