Hatsun Agro Product Ltd., v. Mr.K.Sarinivas Reddy,

JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the plaintiff has made an endorsement in the Court bundle on instructions giving up the reliefs sought for insofar as prayers C,D, E and F found in paragraph No.24 of the plaint. In view of the same, the suit claim insofar as the relief sought in C, D, E and F in paragraph No.24 of the plaint is dismissed as not pressed. Therefore, the plaintiff is restricting its suit claim only in respect of prayers A & B found in paragraph No.24 of the plaint.

¶2The suit has been filed for infringement and passing off. The plaintiff adopted and has been using the Trade Mark AROKYA in respect of milk and related products since 1994. The plaintiff has obtained registration for the trademark AROKYA under various classes, more particularly Class 29, Class 30, Class 31 and Class 32 and are in the business of manufacturing and selling products under these classes. According to the plaintiff in the month of January 2022, they were shocked to discover the defendant's intention to launch milk products under the impugned mark SRI AROGYA. The plaintiff immediately sent a cease and desist notice on 11.01.2022 to the defendant calling upon him to cease and desist from launching his products under the impugned mark SRI AROGYA in the market. According to the plaintiff, despite issuing the cease and desist notice, the defendant has been continuing to use the impugned mark SRI AROGYA in the market. A reminder notice dated 10.03.2022 was also sent by the plaintiff to the defendant once again reminding him to stop using the impugned mark SRI AROGYA. According to the plaintiff, the combination of colour scheme, get up, pictorial depictions and package design adopted by the defendant for his packaging is identical / deceptively similar to the packaging of the plaintiff's products sold under the trademark AROKYA.

¶3According to the plaintiff apart from the trade dress, the colour combination of the impugned mark of the defendant is also similar to that of the plaintiff. In the aforementioned circumstances, the present suit has been filed for infringement and passing off. The defendant has been set exparte by this Court on 26.07.2023. Till date, no application has been filed by the defendant to set aside the exparte order.

¶4Before the learned Additional Master II, proof affidavit has been filed by the plaintiff's witness by name P.Vivek, who was examined as P.W.1. The following documents were marked as Exhibits on the side of the plaintiff before the learned Additional Master – II :

¶1Ex.P1 is the Board resolution of plaintiff company authorizing Mr.P.Vivek to represent the plaintiff company.

¶2Ex.P2 is the photocopy of the incorporation certificates dated

04.03.1986.

¶3Ex.P3 is the website printout of company master data of the plaintiff company dated 23.06.2023.

¶4Ex.P4 is the Trademark legal user certificates (series 1-33)

¶5Ex.P5 is the Chartered Accountant certificate for plaintiff company from the year 1994-1995 to the year 2020-2021.

¶6Ex.P6 is the Chartered Accountant certificate of the plaintiff mark Arokya from the year 2013-2014 to 2020-2021

¶7Ex.P7 is the photocopy of ISO certificates obtained by the plaintiff company dated 04.12.2018.

¶8Ex.P8 is the photocopy of the FSSAI certificate of the plaintiff company dated 09.12.2018 valid upto 05.05.2023.

¶9Ex.P9 is the office copy of Invoices of advertisement expenses of plaintiff company for the brand Arokya.

¶10Ex.P10 is the printout copy of Advertisements/ Pamphlets of the plaintiff company

¶11Ex.P11 is the printout copy of Advertisements published in various news papers and journals.

¶12Ex.P12 is the printout copy of List of distributors of plaintiff product through out India.

¶13Ex.P13 is the printout copy of invoices against the orders made for the plaintiff product from the year 1994

¶14Ex.P14 is the printout copy of Screenshots along with CD of the television advertisement for the mark Arokya

¶15Ex.P15 is the original product package of plaintiff product Arokya

¶16Ex.P16 is the original product package of defendant's product Sri Arogya

¶17Ex.P17 is the printout of defendants FSSAI certificate dated 13.12.2021

¶18Ex.P18 is the cease and desist notice issued by the plaintiff dated

11.01.2022 along with acknowledgment card

¶19Ex.P19 is the reminder cease and desist notice issued by the plaintiff dated 10.03.2022 along with acknowledgement card.

¶5As seen from the aforementioned Exhibits, more particularly Exs.P15 and P16 which gives a comparison between the plaintiff's product package AROKYA as well as the defendant's product package SRI AROGYA, it is clear that the combination of the colour scheme, get up, pictorial depictions and package design adopted by the defendant for his packaging is deceptively similar to the packaging of the plaintiff's product sold under the trade mark AROKYA. The comparison of the product packaging of the plaintiff as well as of the defendant is reproduced herein:-

¶6As seen from the comparison, the colour fonts used by the defendant's is similar to that of the plaintiff's registered trade mark AROKYA as well as its products packaging. The colour scheme, getup, pictorial depictions and package design adopted by the defendant copies the colour scheme, get up, pictorial depictions and package design adopted by the plaintiff. There are three colours adopted by the defendant which is identical to that of the plaintiff, who is also using three colours. The plaintiff has obtained Registration for the trade mark AROKYA under various classes more particularly, Class 29, Class 30, Class 31 and Class 32 and are in the business of manufacturing and selling products under these classes, ever since 1994. The Registration Certificate for obtaining Registration for the trademark AROKYA has also been marked as Ex.P4. Ex.P4 also contains the trademark Legal usage certificate (series 1-33). The plaintiff has also issued a cease and desist notice to the defendant, which is dated 11.01.2022, which has been marked as Ex.P18 calling upon the defendant not to use the impugned mark SRI AROGYA. The said notice has also been duly acknowledged by the defendant as seen from Ex.P18. A reminder cease and desist notice has also been sent by the plaintiff which is dated 10.03.2022 which is marked as Ex.P19. The said reminder notice was also served on the defendant as seen from the acknowledgement card which is also marked as Ex.P19. A categorical assertion has been made by the plaintiff that despite receipt of the cease and desist notice, the defendant has been continuing to use the impugned mark SRI AROGYA. The plaintiff is having a huge sales turn over as seen from the averments contained in the plaint as well as from the documents which have been marked as Exs.P5 & P6. Ex.P6 is the sales turnover and the promotional advertisement cost incurred by the plaintiff in respect of the products using the trademark AROKYA alone.

¶7After giving due consideration to the oral and documentary evidence placed on record by the plaintiff, this Court is of the considered view that the plaintiff has proved the suit claim, insofar as prayers a & b of the plaint prayers are concerned. The plaintiff has already given up the plaint reliefs insofar prayers C to F are concerned. On account of the infringement of the plaintiff's trademark, the defendant is also liable to pay the costs of the suit.

¶8For the foregoing reasons, the suit is partly decreed by granting the following reliefs :- a) permanent injunction restraining the defendant or any person claiming through him from infringing the plaintiff's registered trademark AROKYA by using the mark SRI AROGYA or any other deceptively similar mark in any manner whatsoever causing infringement to the plaintiff's registered trademark AROKYA. b) permanent injunction restraining the defendant or any person claiming through him from passing off and enabling others to pass off the defendant's business as that of the plaintiff's by using the mark SRI AROGYA or any other mark or trade name which is deceptively similar or identical to the plaintiff's trademark AROKYA in any manner whatsoever.

¶9The defendant is also directed to pay the cost of the suit.

30.10.2023 Index: Yes/ No Speaking order / Non speaking order vsi2 APPENDIX List of Witness Examined on the side of the Plaintiff: Mr.P.Vivek as PW1 List of documents marked on the side of the plaintiff : S. No. Exhibits Description of documents

¶1P1 Ex.P1 is the Board resolution of plaintiff company authorizing Mr.P.Vivek to represent the plaintiff company.

¶2P2 Ex.P2 is the photocopy of the incorporation certificates dated 04.03.1986.

¶3P3 Ex.P3 is the website printout of company master data of the plaintiff company dated 23.06.2023.

¶4P4 Ex.P4 is the Trademark legal user certificates (series 1-33)

¶5P5 Ex.P5 is the Chartered Accountant certificate for plaintiff company from the year 1994-1995 to the year 2020-2021.

¶6P6 Ex.P6 is the Chartered Accountant certificate of the plaintiff mark Arokya from the year 2013-2014 to 2020-2021

¶7P7 Ex.P7 is the photocopy of ISO certificates obtained by the plaintiff company dated 04.12.2018.

¶8P8 Ex.P8 is the photocopy of the FSSAI certificate of the plaintiff company dated 09.12.2018 valid upto

05.05.2023.

¶9P9 Ex.P9 is the office copy of Invoices of advertisement expenses of plaintiff company for the brand Arokya.

¶10P10 Ex.P10 is the printout copy of Advertisements/ Pamphlets of the plaintiff company

¶11P11 Ex.P11 is the printout copy of Advertisements published in various news papers and journals.

¶12P12 Ex.P12 is the printout copy of List of distributors of plaintiff product through out India.

¶13P13 Ex.P13 is the printout copy of invoices against the orders made for the plaintiff product from the year 1994

¶14P14 Ex.P14 is the printout copy of Screenshots along with CD of the television advertisement for the mark Arokya

¶15P15 Ex.P15 is the original product package of plaintiff product Arokya

¶16P16 Ex.P16 is the original product package of defendant's product Sri Arogya

¶17P17 Ex.P17 is the printout of defendants FSSAI certificate dated 13.12.2021

¶18P18 Ex.P18 is the cease and desist notice issued by the plaintiff

dated

11.01.2022

along

with acknowledgment card

¶19P19 Ex.P19 is the reminder cease and desist notice issued by the plaintiff dated 10.03.2022 along with acknowledgement card.

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. vsi2 C.S. (Comm. Div) No.136 of 2022

31.10.2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30.10.2023 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE C.S. (Comm. Div) No.136 of 2022 Hatsun Agro Product Ltd. Rep. By its Authorised Signatory P. Vivek ... Plaintiff vs. K. Sarinivas Reddy, Proprietor of M/s.Balaji Milk Foods, Having office at Mallaram (V), Nizamabad, Telangana – 503 001. ... Defendant Prayer : Plaint has been filed Order VII Rule 1 CPC read with Order IV Rule 1 of High Court O.S. Rules and Section 134 and 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Section 7 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 prays for judgment and decree ; A. For a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, by itself, its servants, agents, legal representatives, distributors or any one claiming through it from in any manner infringing the Plaintiff's registered trademark AROKYA by using the mark SRI AROGYA or any other deceptively similar mark in any manner whatsoever causing infringement to the plaintiff's registered trademark as described in the Schedule to the Plaint. B. For a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, by itself, its servants, agents, legal representatives, distributors or any one claiming through it from in any manner whatsoever from passing off and enabling others to pass off the Defendant's business as that of the Plaintiff's by using the mark SRI AROGYA or any other mark or trade name which is deceptively similar or identical to the Plaintiff's trademark AROKYA in any manner whatsoever. C. For a declaration that the Plaintiff's trademark AROKYA is a well-known mark as recognised under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. D. Directing the Defendant to surrender to the Plaintiff all the products and stocks with the offending labels, together with the blocks, dies, name boards, sign boards, etc., for destruction. E. Directing the Defendant to render true and faithful accounts of the profits earned by it through the sale of the products bearing the offending trademark labels and directing payment of such profits to the Plaintiff. F. Directing the Defendant to pay to the Plaintiff a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- as damages for committing acts of infringement of trademark and passing off. G. Grant such further or other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. For Plaintiff : Ms.Y.K.Aiswarya for M/s.Surana and Surana For Defendant : Set exparte