Gunasekaran v. Arun Agencies

JUDGMENT This appeal has been filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation. The findings rendered by the Tribunal with regard to the negligence has attained finality as no appeal has been filed by the Insurance Company challenging the adverse findings with regard to the negligence.

¶2The Tribunal under the impugned award has directed the Insurance Company to pay a total compensation of Rs.5,41,476/- to the appellant as detailed hereunder :- Heads Amount awarded by the Tribunal (Rs.) Compensation

towards Disability 1,20,000 Compensation towards pain and sufferings 30,000 Compensation

towards medical bills 3,23,476 Compensation towards Future Medical expenses 30,000 Compensation towards extra nourishment 10,000 Compensation

towards transportation 10,000 Loss of income during treatment 18,000 Total 5,41,476/-

¶3Heard Mr.C. Kulanthaivel, learned counsel for the appellant / claimant and Mr.K. Padmanabhan, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent / Insurance Company. The 1st respondent has remained ex-parte both before the Tribunal as well as this Court.

¶4This Court has perused and examined the impugned award passed by the Tribunal.

¶5The accident happened in the year 2013. The Medical Board has assessed the disability of the appellant as a result of an accident caused by a vehicle insured with the 2nd respondent / Insurance Company at 40%. Based on the said assessment, the Tribunal has fixed the disability of the appellant /claimant at 40%. No contra evidence is also available to disprove the said assessment. Therefore, this Court is of the considered view that the Tribunal has rightly assessed the disability of the appellant / claimant at 40%.

¶6The appellant / claimant has sustained the following injuries as a result of the accident caused by a vehicle insured with the 2nd respondent / Insurance Company:- 1) Closed comminuted fracture shaft of (Rt) femur mid third and distal third 2) Comminuted fracture both bone (Rt) leg mid third and distal 3rd 3) Laceration ver (Rt) skin of 1g and posterior aspect of distal 3rd leg.

¶7The appellant / claimant has also taken the following treatments in the hospital, as seen from the discharge summary (Ex.P9) :- Treatment taken on 05.04.2013 1) Closed reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary interlocking nail for femur (Rt.) 2) Closed reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary interlocking nail for (Rt) tibia 3) Wound debridement for lacerated wounds Treatment taken on 12.04.2013 1) Wound debridement, muscle flap and SSG

¶8The appellant / claimant was hospitalised for a period of 12 days from 05.04.2013 to 17.04.2013. The Tribunal has awarded a compensation of Rs.1,20,000/- towards the appellant's / claimant's disability, calculated at Rs.3,000/- per percentage of disability for the 40% disability suffered by the appellant / claimant. The accident happened in the year 2013. This Court is of the considered view that even though the Tribunal has rightly assessed the disability, the Tribunal ought to have awarded compensation at Rs.4,000/- per percentage of disability as the accident happened in the year 2013. Accordingly, this Court enhances, the disability compensation payable to the appellant / claimant from Rs.1,20,000/- to Rs.1,60,000/-, calculated at Rs.4,000/- per percentage of disability for the 40% disability suffered by the appellant / claimant. The appellant / claimant was a Coolie (Labourer) at the time of the accident. He had claimed that he was earning Rs.9,000/-p.m. at the time of the accident. The Tribunal has awarded a compensation of Rs.18,000/- towards loss of income during the treatment period to the appellant / claimant. As (Labourer) Coolie, the appellant / claimant would have certainly earned Rs.6,500/-p.m. in the year 2013. This Court after giving due consideration to the nature of injuries sustained by the appellant / claimant, the period of his hospitalisation and the time spent for medical treatment subsequent to his discharge from the hospital is of the considered view that the loss of income granted by the Tribunal at Rs.18,000/- is low. This Court is of the considered view that atleast for a period of four months considering the nature of injuries sustained by the appellant / claimant, the appellant / claimant would have been unable to perform his regular employment. Therefore, this Court fixes the notional monthly income of the appellant / claimant at Rs.6,500/-p.m. and if loss of income is calculated for a period of four months, the total compensation payable to the appellant / claimant towards loss of income would be Rs.6,500/- x 4 = Rs.26,000/-. Accordingly, the loss of income granted by the Tribunal at Rs.18,000/- is enhanced to Rs.26,000/- by this Court.

¶9With regard to the compensation awarded by the Tribunal under various other heads viz., pain and suffering, future medical expenses, extra nourishment and transportation are concerned, this Court is of the considered view that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal under those heads is a just compensation and it does not call for any interference.

¶10Insofar as the compensation awarded by the Tribunal towards medical bills at Rs.3,23,476/- is concerned, the same is confirmed by this Court as it is supported by medical bills, which were marked as Ex.P.10 (Series).

¶11For the foregoing reasons, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is enhanced to Rs.5,81,476/- from Rs.5,41,476/- as detailed hereunder: Heads Amount Awarded by the Tribunal in Rs. Amount Awarded by this Court in Rs. Compensation towards Disability 1,20,000 1,60,000 Compensation towards pain and sufferings 30,000 30,000 Compensation towards medical bills 3,23,476 3,23,476 Compensation towards

Future Medical expenses 30,000 30,000 Compensation towards

extra nourishment 10,000 10,000 Compensation towards transportation 10,000 10,000 Loss of income during treatment 18,000 26,000 Total 5,41,476/- 5,89,476

¶12In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed by enhancing the compensation from Rs.5,41,476/- to Rs.5,89,476/-. No Costs.

¶13The 2nd respondent / Insurance Company is directed to deposit the amount awarded by this Court, after deducting the amount already deposited if any, together with interest from the date of claim till the date of deposit and cost, to the credit of M.C.O.P.No.363 of 2013, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. On such deposit being made, the Tribunal is directed to transfer the award amount directly to the bank account of the appellant /claimant through RTGS, within a period of two weeks thereafter. Necessary Court fee, if any has to be paid by the appellant / claimant before receiving the copy of this Judgment.

10.04.2024 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order vsi2 To

¶1The IV Additional District Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Erode District at Bhavani.

2.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Madras, Chennai – 104.

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

vsi2

10.04.2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.04.2024 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Gunasekaran ... Appellant vs. 1. Arun Agencies, No.10 M, Eswara Nagar, K. Vadamadurai, Coimbatore. (Notice for R1 may be dispensed with for the time being and separate petition is filed for the same) 2. National Insurance Company Ltd., Rep. By its Manager, Karthikeya Complex, 408, B-10, Mettur Main Road, Bhavani. .... Respondents Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to set aside the order made in M.C.O.P. No.363 of 2013 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum IV Additional District Judge, Erode District at Bhavani, dated 22.11.2017 and for enhancement of compensation. For Appellant : Mr.C. Kulanthaivel For Respondents : R1 - Exparte Mr.K. Padmanabhan for R2