VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

V.Santhanam v. The Commissioner,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 June 2026
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WP 16108/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition is filed for the following relief: "To direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider and dispose the petitioner's representation dated 12/12/2025 consequently direct the 1st and 2nd respondents seeking regulations of suspension period as duty period, payment of salary for 939 days, payment of pending 10 months salary, Grant of EPF and other service benefits, restoration to time scale of pay, payment of arrears based on accountant's calculation."

¶2The petitioner was appointed as a Ticket Seller / Multi-purpose worker in the 3rd respondent temple on 01.09.2009. The case of the petitioner is that he was suspended from service based on 16 charges framed against him. The petitioner preferred an appeal petition and by order dated 15.02.2023, it was held that the charges against him were not proved. Page3 of 6

¶3The grievance of the petitioner is that despite exoneration, the 2nd respondent treated one and half hears of service as non employment / no pay period. The petitioner was also denied salary for the period of March 2011 to July 2011 and February 2015 to June 2015. Therefore, the petitioner made a representation dated 12.12.2025 to the respondents seeking regulation of suspension period as duty period, payment of salary for 939 days, payment of pending 10 months salary, Grant of EPF and other service benefits etc., However, the same has not been considered. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶4Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner's representation dated 12.12.2025 has not been considered to date, a direction is issued to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page4 of 6

¶5With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 08-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order KAN Page5 of 6 To

1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034.

2.The Deputy Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Tirupur, Tirupur District.

3.The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Chozheeswarar Swamy Temple, Moolanur, Tharapuram Taluk, Tirupur District. 638 106. Page6 of 6

P.T.ASHA, J. KAN 08-06-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA V.Santhanam ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Tirupur, Tirupur District. 3. The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Chozheeswarar Swamy Temple, Moolanur, Tharapuram Taluk, Tirupur District. 638 106. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider and dispose the petitioner's representation dated 12/12/2025 consequently direct the 1st and 2nd respondents seeking regulations of suspension period as duty period, payment of salary for 939 days, payment of pending 10 months salary, Grant of EPF and other service benefits, restoration to time scale of pay, payment of arrears based on accountant's calculation. Page2 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Mr. T.V.G.Kartheeban For Respondent(s): Mr. D.Yashwanth Raja Government Advocate (HR & CE)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.