VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2024 › High Court of Madras

K.S.Mohan v. V.Chamundeswari

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 December 2024
Bench
Rmt. Teekaa Ramanauthor
Case no.
OP 236/2024

Judgment

O R D E R This petition has been filed under Section 258 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with Order XXV Rule 5 of the High Court Original side Rules in the matter of the Indian Succession Act XXXIX of 1925 and in the matter of last Will and Testament of the deceased V.Saraswathi.

¶2The above named V.Saraswathi, died on 26.05.2014 at No.80, Ward I, Pillaiyar Koil Street, Kiliyanur Post, Villupuram District being the native place and ordinary residence of the deceased. At the time of her death, the said Saraswathi left properties at Kiliyanur Village, Villupuram District, the fixed deposit invested in various companies at Chennai and Tindivanam, Bank Accounts in Chennai and Tindivanam and the jewels kept in the safety locker of T.N.S.C.Bank, Kotturpuram Branch, Chennai. The deceased Saraswathi has executed a Will and Testament in favour of her mother S.Sarojini dated 21.10.2013. The said Sarojini is the executrix named in the Will, executed by the deceased Saraswathi. The mother Sarojini and the respondent herein are the beneficiaries under the Will executed by the deceased Saraswathi. The Page No.2 of 9 respondent is the only daughter of the deceased Saraswathi. The husband of the deceased Saraswathi viz., S.Vivekandan has obtained a decree of divorce against her. The amount of assets which are likely to come to hands of the mother of the deceased does not exceed in the aggregate a sum of Rs.25,73,019/- and the net amount of the said assets after deducting all the items which the mother of the deceased is by law allowed to deduct is only of the value of Rs.25,53,019/-. The deceased left behind the following persons as her legal heirs: Sl.No Name Relationship Now arrayed

¶1V.Chamundeswari Daughter Respondent

¶2S.Sarojini (Died) Mother Petitioner

¶3S.Vivekandhan Husband (Diverse

¶3The executrix S.Sarojini filed O.P.No.157 of 2015 before this Court for the issuance of Probate Annexed with the Will dated

21.10.2013. The respondent has filed Caveat and so the O.P.No.157 of 2015 was converted into a suit and it was numbered as T.O.S.No.25 of 2015. Out of sincere negotiation between the partie and their respective counsels entire dispute between the plaintiff and defendant has amicably settled. The memo of compromise more fully set out in the schedule of Page No.3 of 9 the orders therein and was further pleased to decree the T.O.S.No.25 of 2015 in terms of the compromise memo and a registry was directed to grant probate in favour of the plaintiff. Before completion of the administration of the Estate, the executrix Sarojini died intestate on

07.07.2023 in her village at Kiliyanur, Vanur Taluk, Villupuram District leaving behind the petitioner, the only son to succeed her estate. Except the petitioner, she left behind no other legal heir. The petitioner undertakes to duly administer the properties and credits of the said Saraswathi (deceased) and in anyway concerning her Will by paying first her debts and then the legacies herein bequeathed, so far as the asets will extend and to make a full and true Inventory thereof.

¶4At this juncture, it is necessary to refer Section 258 of the Indian Succession 1925, states that if an executor to whom probate has been granted died leaving a part of the Testators un-administered, a new representative may be appointed for the purpose of administrating such part of the estate.

¶5Now the petition is filed for the Letters of administration in favour of the petitioner in respect of the Will executed by the deceased Page No.4 of 9 Saraswathi within the limitation of Tamilnadu. During the evidence before the Master, PW2-Janakiraman, one of the attestor has spoken about how the deceased Saraswathi has affixed her signature and at the time of assigning her signature she was in a good state of mind and good health at the time of the execution and in the presence of the executrix, Mohan has also signed as the first attestor (examined as PW1) marked Ex.P1-the certified copy of the decree dated 09.06.2023 in T.O.S.No.25 of 2015 passed by this Court. Ex.P2 is the certified copy of the judgment dated 09.06.2023 in T.O.S.No.25 of 2015 passed by this Court. Ex.P3 is the original Will dated 21.10.2013 executed by Saraswathi. Ex.P4 is the computer generated death certificate of Sarojini. Ex.P5 is the computer generated legal heir certificate of Sarojini. Ex.P6 is the Original Probate Order dated 21.10.2013 in O.P.No.157 of 2015 passed by this Court. Ex.P7 is the Affidavit of Assets showing the net value of the Estate as Rs.25,53,019/- and Ex.P8 is the certificate under Section 65B of the Evidence Act, 1872.

¶6On a combined reading of evidence PW1 & PW2 and Ex.B1 to Ex.B7, I find that the Will executed by Saraswathi is proved in the manner known to law and since the Will already deposited in Page No.5 of 9 T.O.S.No.25 of 2015 wherein the parties have arrived at a compromise as per the pleadings and evidence of PW1 and hence, I find there is no impediment in granting the Letters of Administration annexed with the Will. In the said T.O.S.25 of 2015 by an order dated 09.06.2023, the memo of compromise was effected whereby both the parties, the petitioner and the defendants are entitled to 50% each.

¶7In the result, this Original Petition in O.P.No.236 of 2024 is allowed and Letters of Administration to be issued in accordance with rules. Such Letters of Administration shall have effect throughout the State of Tamilnadu. The petitioner is directed to execute a security bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) in the name of the Assistant Registrar (Original Side-II) of this Court. The petitioner is further directed to render true and correct accounts once in a year.

27.12.2024 Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No PJL Page No.6 of 9 APPENDIX Petitioner's witness: P.W.1 – K.S.Mohan P.W.2 – M.Janakiraman Page No.7 of 9 Petitioner's Exhibits: Exhibits Date Documents P1

09.06.2023 Certified Copy of the decree in T.O.S.No.25/2015. P2

09.06.2023 Certified Copy of the judgment in T.O.S.No.25/2015. P3

21.10.2013 Original Will executed by V.Saraswathi P4

14.07.2023 Computer generated death certificate of Mrs.Sarojini. P5

23.08.2023 Computer generated legal heir certificate of Sarojini. P6

21.10.2013 Original Probate Order in O.P.No.157/2015 P7

26.02.2024 Affidavit of Assets showing the net value of the Estate as Rs.25,53,019/- P8

30.08.2024 Certificate under Section 65B of the Evidence Act, 1872. P9

30.08.2024 Affidavit of M.Janakiraman, the attesting witness filed under Order XXV Rule 4(c) of O.S.Rules. 27 .12.2024 PJL Page No.8 of 9

RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J. PJL

27.12.2024

Page No.9 of 9

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved On : 18.10.2024 Delivered On : 27 .12.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN K.S.Mohan … Petitioner Vs. V.Chamundeswari ... Respondent PRAYER: Original Petition filed under Section 258 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with Order XXV Rule 5 of the High Court Original Side Rules, to issue letters of Administration in favour of the petitioner with respect of the Will dated 21.10.2013 executed by the deceased V.Saraswathi to have effect limited to the State of Tamil Nadu. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Krishnasamy For Respondent : Mr.S.Udayakumar Page No.1 of 9

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.