- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 19 November 2024
- Bench
- Kardak Ete
- Case no.
- IA(Crl) 97/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 20.11.2024 Heard Mr. J. Tsering, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. G. Tado, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, praying for condonation of delay of 25 days in filing the connected criminal appeal against the judgment and sentence order dated 27.08.2024, passed by the Special Judge, NDPS, Bomdila in NDPS Case No.13/2023 in connection with Page No.# 2/2 Kalaktang P.S. Case No.11/2021. Having considered the grounds taken in the application for condonation of delay in filing the connected criminal appeal and the prayer not being opposed to by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, I am satisfied that the applicant has shown a sufficient cause which prevented him to file the connected appeal within a period of limitation. Accordingly, the delay of 25 days in filing the connected appeal is condoned. The interlocutory application(criminal) stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040015812024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/97/2024 Tenzin Tsering Son of Shri Kashi, a resident of Brokpalangchen Village, PO and PS Khalaktang, West Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP represented by the PP of AP Advocate for the Petitioner : J Tsering, Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.