- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 16 December 2024
- Bench
- Kardak Ete
- Case no.
- WP(C) 502/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 17.12.2024
Mr. G. Bam, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has an instruction to withdraw the present writ petition. Therefore, he prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the same with a liberty to file a fresh.
The prayer of the petitioner is accepted and allowed.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal, with a liberty, as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040014772024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/502/2024 Miss Techi Yami Daughter of Techi Passo, a permanent resident of Village Karoi, PO and PS Sagalee, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 2 Ors represented by the Commissioner/ Secretary, Town Planning and Urban Local Bodies, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Director of Urban Local Bodies Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:Bamang Sanjay Age: 0 Occupation : Assistant Engineer Town Planning and Urban Local Bodies Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar Advocate for the Petitioner : T T Tara, Pondit Ronya,Kirmani Lollen,Terji Kamchi,Taba Tokur,Khoda Apa,Gamken Bam Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.