- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 22 October 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Marli Vankung
- Case no.
- WP(C) 465/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 23.10.2024
Heard Mr. T. Gammi, learned counsel for the petitioner, who has prayed that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition due to certain technical defects and that he may be allowed to file a fresh. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh, if so advised. Accordingly, WP(C)465(AP)2024 stands disposed of on withdrawal.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040013982024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/465/2024 Sadak Garu Son of Shri Tapo Garu, a permanent resident of Village Payum, PO Payum, PS Kaying, Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 3 Ors represented by the Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supply, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Civil Secretariat, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:The Director Food and Civil Supplies Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The District Food and Civil Supplies Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Siang District Boleng Arunachal Pradesh. 4:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Siang District Boleng Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Adam Tatak, Tanur Gao,Logsang Yountan,Tukrin Ligu,Dejum Tally,Tayom Gamoh,Tsering Gyatso,Tonni Gammi,Kaling Mibang Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.