- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 29 September 2024
- Bench
- Kardak Ete
- Case no.
- IA(C) 186/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 30-09-2024
Heard Ms. R. Taku, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. Page No.# 2/2 K. Wangmu, learned Government Advocate for the opposite party/respondents.
¶2By filing this application, the applicant has sought for impleadment of one Shri Iken Tao as respondent No. 3 in the connected Writ Petition No. 110(AP)2024.
¶3This Court, vide order dated 26.03.2024 has allowed the applicant/writ petitioner to implead on Shri Iken Tao, having been found to be a necessary party, as the respondents had cancelled the Land Possession Certificate of the petitioner on the basis of the affidavit submitted by Shri Iken Tao.
¶4Since the applicant/petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of the order dated 13.07.2023, by which, the Land Possession Certificate of the petitioner has been cancelled on the basis of the affidavit submitted by one Shri Iken Tao, I deem it appropriate to allow this application.
¶5Accordingly, Shri Iken Tao be impleaded as respondent No. 3 in the connected Writ Petition No. 110(AP)2024.
¶6The interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040013222024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/186/2024 Smti Mongam Dini Wife of Shri Yumjum Dini, resident of Liru Village, Likabali, PO and PS Likabali, Lower Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The Deputy Commissioner and Anr Likabali, Lower Siang, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, PO and PS Likabali, Lower Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:The District Land Record and Settlement Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Likabali Govt of Arunachal Pradesh PO and PS Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : R Taku, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.