- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 9 December 2024
- Bench
- N. Unni Krishnan Nair
- Case no.
- Crl.Petn. 158/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 10-12-2024 Heard Mr. C. Modi, learned counsel for petitioners. Also heard Mr. G. Tado, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
Mr. C. Modi, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have inadvertently failed to make a challenge to the charge sheet filed in the matter and accordingly, submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to the petitioners to file the same, if so advised, in a proper form.
Prayer accepted.
The present Criminal Petition stands dismissed on withdrawal, however, with a liberty, as prayed for.
Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040012842024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Crl.Petn./158/2024 Lolit Sharma and 2 Ors Son of Shri Hemlal Sharma, a resident of Village High Region, Po and PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Tatem Padung Age: Occupation : Son of Late Dulem Padung a resident of village Merem PO Bilat PS Ruksin East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 3: Sanjiv Roy Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Triveni Roy a resident of near Govt Gandhi Secondary School Pasighat PO and PS Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP represented by the PP of AP Advocate for the Petitioner : Chorpok Modi, Wanglat Khomrang,Maji Dui,Nannu Yubi,M Lego,Tame Rimi,Nabam Chatum,Uttam Deka Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.