Risso Kame v. The State of Ap and 6 Ors

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040012322024

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/165/2024 Risso Kame Son of Late Risso Hamak, R/o Hote Village, PO/PS Sangram, Dist. Kurung Kumey, Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 791111 VERSUS The State of AP and 6 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 791111 2:Jainco Enterprise Private Limited Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its Director (Old address) Sangram Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh 791118. (New address) SPT Panchali near P/House Itanagar Capital Arunachal Pradesh 791111 (New Address) KK Mundra No. 592 Welcome Tower Opposite Modi College Road Kota Rajasthan India 324009 3:The Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Department of Land Management Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 4:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Page No.# 2/3 Occupation : Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh 791118 5:The Chief Engineer (Highway) Age: 0 Occupation : Public Works Department Western Zone Itanagar Govt of Arunachal Pradesh 791111 6:The Union of India Age: 0 Occupation : represented by the Secretary Ministry of Road and Transport and Highway Govt of India Transport Bhawan No.2 Parliament Street New Delhi 110001 7:National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd Age: 0 Occupation : 3rd Floor PTI Building 4th Parliament Street New Delhi 11000 Advocate for the Petitioner : Jyoti Zongluju, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), DSGI,Marto Kato

-BEFORE-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA

20.09.2024 By filing this Interlocutory Application, the applicant, who is the writ petitioner in the connected writ petition has prayed for allowing him to Page No.# 3/3 amend the cause title in respect of respondent No. 2, namely, Jainco Enterprise. Mr. T. Chisi, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the respondent No. 2 has been able to collect two new address of respondent No. 2 which is sought to be brought on record. We have heard Ms. G. Ete, learned Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 & 4. In view of the nature of explanation given, the prayer is allowed. The applicant is permitted to bring on record the new addresses of respondent No. 2 in the connected writ petition. This I.A. stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant