- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 4 September 2024
- Bench
- Kardak Ete
- Case no.
- WP(C) 372/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 05.09.2024
Heard Mr. T. Torum, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. Ratan, learned Additional Advocate General, for the State respondent and Mr. T. Tagum, learned counsel for the caveator.
Mr. Torum, learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter for more than 30(thirty) minutes, prayed for withdrawal of the writ petition with a liberty to file a fresh.
Prayer is allowed.
The writ petition stand dismissed on withdrawal with a liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040011202024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/372/2024 M/s B K Construction Lachit Nagar, Jeoti Path, Dibrugarh, Assam 786001 represented by Shri Jotham Toko Hannan, Son of Late Toko Dol, resident of A Sector, Near Raj Bhawan, PO and PS Itanagar, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS 1) The State of AP and 3 Ors Address - through Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. Tana Roma Tara,Likha Tabin,Rage koyu,Taba Tagum 2) The Chief Engineer (PWD) Central Zone B, APPWD, Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 3) The Superintendent Engineering Boleng circle, Boleng, Upper Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 4) The Executive Engineer (PWD) Mariyang, Upper Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. Advocate for the Petitioner : T. Torum. Advocate for the Respondent : T. Tagum N. Ratan, GA (AP) Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.