- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 29 June 2023
- Bench
- Marli Vankung
- Case no.
- WP(C) 304/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 29-06-2023 Heard Mr. T. Gyatso, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. T. Jamoh, learned Standing counsel for the Education Department representing respondent Nos. 1 & 2 as well as Mr. R. L. Thungon, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the transfer and posting order, dated 07.06.2023 issued by the Director, Secondary Education, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh vide order No.DSE-11012/2/2023, whereby the petitioner has been transferred and posted from the Government Higher Secondary School, Bilat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh to Government Higher Secondary School, Chayangtajo, East Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned transfer and posting order is in contravention with the Circular No. PERS-35/98 (Pt), dated
02.06.1998 on policy guidelines of transfer and posting and the modified order, dated
19.12.2008. He further submits that against the impugned transfer and posting order, he had filed a representation, dated 21.06.2023. However, the above representation has not been addressed to till date and prayed that the state respondents may be directed to consider and dispose of his representation immediately. Mr. T. Jamoh, learned Standing counsel for the Education Department/ representing respondent Nos. 1 & 2 along with Mr. R. L. Thungon, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 having accepted notices on behalf of their respective respondents jointly submits that the above representation submitted by the petitioner will be duly considered. Mr. Thungon, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 submits that a release order of the petitioner, dated 29.06.2023 has been issued and therefore, this writ petition itself could become infructuous. Having heard the submission advanced by both the parties, this Court finds that Page No.# 3/3 it is a fit case to issue a direction, more particularly, to the respondent No. 2/The Director of Secondary Education to consider and dispose of the representation, dated
21.06.2023 submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law within 1 (one) week from the date a certified copy of this order is received. Accordingly, considering the limited prayer that has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition being WP (C) No. 304 (AP) 2023 stands disposed of with the above directions.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040008792023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C) 304/2023 1:Surya Bhusan Mishra S/o Lt. Hari Bansh Mishra, Permanent resident of Baherwam village, P.O Mahuwan, P.S Kateya, District Gopalganj, Bihar and presently posted at PGT at Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bilat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. Cont. No. 919863826429 VERSUS 1:THE STATE OF AP and 2 Ors. The State of Arunachal Pradesh, represented by the commissioner, Department of Education, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Civil Secretariat, Itanagar 2:The Director of Secondary Education Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. 3:Mamum Perme PGT(Hindi) Govt Sec School Chayangtajo East Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Adam Tatak Advocate for the Respondent : Tagum Jamoh BEFORE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG Page No.# 2/3
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.