Smt. Rotinmani v. District Magistrate

ORDER

04.11.2024

Heard Mr. Lalrokunga Pautu, learned counsel for the petitioner, who has filed the instant application under Section 438 & 442 of the BNSS, 2023 for quashing or modifying the order dated 23.08.2024, passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mamit, with regards to para 21 of the judgment and order wherein the learned Trial Court had ordered the destruction of the seized articles while acquitting the petitioners against the charge leveled against them under Section Page No.# 2/2 188 of IPC. However, it is seen that the State has not been made a party in the instant case. In view of the above, the petitioner is allowed to withdraw the instant application with a permission to file afresh by including the necessary parties in the instant Criminal Revision Petition. JUDGE Annette

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC030006692024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./3/2024 Smt. Rotinmani D/o Sangpianga (L) R/o Zemabawk North Aizawl, Mizoram VERSUS District Magistrate Mamit District, Mizoram Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Lalrokunga Pautu Advocate for the Respondent : B E F O R E HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG