Sh v. Lalzamvela Vs State of Mizoram and 3 Ors

ORDER BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO

21.11.2024 Ms. Rosy Manlawmsangi, learned counsel appears for the petitioner and submits that this matter has been wrongly clubbed together with Item Nos. 2 to

¶10She submits that the subject matter of the instant writ petition pertains to service unlike the claim for compensation in the other writ petitions clubbed together with this case. As such, this matter is detached from the other writ petitions. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would like to incorporate some other pleadings and documents in the writ petition, which he had inadvertently failed to do so. She therefore submits that she may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. Ms. H. Lalmalsawmi, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the State respondents has no objection to the prayer. In view of above, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty Page No.# 3/3 to file afresh, if so advised.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC030004572021 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/28/2024 Sh. V. Lalzamvela S/o V. Hrangchhunga (L) R/o Venghnuai Aizawl Mizoram VERSUS State of Mizoram and 3 Ors. r/b the Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl Mizoram 2:The Commissioner/ Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Power and Electricity Dept. Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl Mizoram 3:The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Dept. of Personnel and Administrative Reforms Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl Mizoram 4:The Mizoram Public Service Commission Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl Mizoram r/b its Chairman Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Joseph Lalchhanhima Renthlei Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA Mizoram for R1 - 3