- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 7 November 2024
- Bench
- Nelson Sailo
- Case no.
- WP(C) 7401/2023
Judgment
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010197942024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/5693/2024o BALINoDASo S/O-oLATEoTAPENDRAoLALoDAS,o R/O-oJ.D.oAPARTMENT,o4-A,o OPPOSITEoFORESToSCHOOL,o GARIGAONoROAD,oNEARoGANGALAYAoBHAVAN,o GUWAHATI,oDIST.-oKAMRUP(M),oASSAM,oPIN-o781014. VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo2oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM,o TRANSPORToDEPARTMENT,oDISPUR,oGHY-06. 2:THEoCHAIRMAN oASSAMoSTATEoTRANSPORToDEPARTMENToCORPORATION oPALTANoBAZAR oGUWAHATI-o8. 3:THEoMANAGINGoDIRECTOR oASSAMoSTATEoTRANSPORToCORPORATION oPALTANoBAZAR oGUWAHATI-8o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoRoISLAM,oLEGALoAIDoCOUNSELo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oSC,oTRANSPORToDEPARTMENT,oASSAM,oSC,oAoSoToCoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/3 B E F O R E HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
08.11.2024 Heard Mr. R Islam, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the petitioner who submits that by filing this writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved with the non-payment of the balance amount of the retirement dues of the petitioner who retired as Chief Engineer in the ASTC on 28.02.2023. He submits that the total amount calculated due to be paid to the petitioner is Rs. 45,49,181.00/- and out of the said amount a sum of Rs. 6,28,153.00/- has been paid to the petitioner on his retirement. However, the balance amount of Rs. 39,21,028.00/- has not been paid and therefore, the petitioner is before this Court. Issue notice of motion returnable by 4 weeks. Ms. R Deka, learned Standing Counsel, ASTC accepts notice on behalf of the respondent ASTC, while Ms. M D Bora, learned Standing Counsel, Transport Department accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 1. Petitioner to serve extra requisite copies of the writ petition to the learned counsels appearing today, within 3 days. List the matter again after 4 (four) weeks. Pendency of the writ petition shall not be a bar for the respondents to pay the balance amount due to the petitioner. Page No.# 3/3 JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.