- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 24 November 2024
- Bench
- Robin Phukan
- Case no.
- MFA 60/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 25.11.2024
Heard Mr. J.P. Baruah, learned counsel for the appellants.
¶2This appeal, under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, is directed against the judgment and award dated 14.08.2024, passed by learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Guwahati Bench, in OAIIu-60/2023.
¶3It is to be noted here that vide impugned judgment and award dated
14.08.2024, the learned Tribunal had directed the respondent authority to pay a sum of Rs. 8,00,000/- in the claim petition preferred by the appellants herein, on account of death of Late Lekhan Chutia at Amalsad Railway Station and also directed to apportion the amount as under:
(i) Smt. Phuleswari Chutia - Rs. 4,50,000/-
(ii) Smt. Debee Chutia Mudoi - Rs. 50,000/-
(iii) Smt. Priyanka Chutia - Rs. 1,00,000/-
(iv) Shri Sadananda Chutia - Rs. 1,00,000/-
(v) Smt. Sangita Chutia - Rs. 1,00,000/-
¶4The learned Tribunal further directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- in the account of the appellant No. 1 though RTGS/NEFT transfer and the remaining 3,50,000/- to be invested in seven FDRs of Rs. 50,000/- each for one to seven years, and also directed that the entire amount of compensation of Rs. 50,000/- payable to Smt. Debee Chutia Mudoi be invested in her name in a nationalized bank as fixed deposit for a period of three years and the entire amount of compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- each payable to Smt. Priyanka Chutia, Shri Sadananda Chutia and Smt. Sangita Chutia be invested in their Page No.# 3/4 names in a nationalized bank as fixed deposit for a period of three years. It was also directed that the awarded amount of Rs. 8,00,000/- will carry pendente lite interest @ 6% per annum from date of registration of the claim petition i.e.
15.02.2023 and the interest will be 9% on account of failing to pay the same within 90 days of the receipt of the order.
¶5Mr. Baruah, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the only grievance of the appellants is that the entire amount in respect of the appellant Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 was directed to be invested as fixed deposit in a nationalized bank and the sum of Rs. 3,50,000/- of the appellant No. 1 was directed to be invested as fixed deposit in a nationalized bank, and all the appellants are major and because of the aforementioned direction for fixed deposit, the appellants are facing much inconvenience and therefore, it is contended to release the entire amount in their favour. In support of his submission, Mr. Baruah has referred to an order of this Court, dated 10.05.2024, in MFA No. 64/2023.
¶6Having heard the submission of learned counsel for the appellants, and also considering the facts and circumstances on the record, especially the submission of Mr. Baruah that all the appellants are major and the direction was given by the learned Tribunal for fixed depositing the entire amount in respect of appellant Nos. 2 to 5 and also the sum of Rs. 3,50,000/- in respect of the appellant No. 1, that caused much inconvenience to them, this Court is inclined to allow this appeal by directing the learned Tribunal to release the entire amount in favour of the appellants.
¶7Accordingly, the impugned judgment and award dated 14.08.2024, stands modified to the extent as indicated above. Page No.# 4/4
¶8In terms of above, this appeal stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010238582024 ooooooo undefined ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oMFA/60/2024o PHULESWARIoCHUTIAoANDo4oORSo W/O.oLATEoLEKHANoCHUTIA 2:oDEBEEoCHUTIA oD/O.oLATEoLEKHANoCHUTIA 3:oPRIYANKAoCHUTIA oD/O.oLATEoLEKHANoCHUTIA 4:oSADANANDAoCHUTIA oD/O.oLATEoLEKHANoCHUTIA 5:oSANGITAoCHUTIA oD/O.oLATEoLEKHANoCHUTIAo ALLoAREoRESIDENToOFoVILL.oKHANGIAoCHHAPORI oP/O.oLAGUABORAH oP/S.oDHEMAJI oDIST.oDHEMAJI oPIN-787053 oASSAMo VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAo REP.oBYoTHEoGENERALoMANAGER,oWESTERNoRAILWAY,oMUMBAI. AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oJ.P.oBARUAH,oMR.oSoSUTRADHAR,MSoNoRAFIQUEo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:o,oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.