- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 25 November 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- AB 2956/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 26.11.2024
Heard Ms. K. Malakar, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. N. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
¶2This application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the petitioners, namely, 1. Sri Ramlal Rajbhar, 2. Sri Mithu Rajbhar and 3. Sri Joseph Basumatari, who are apprehending their arrest in connection with Udalguri P.S. Case No. 126/2024 under Sections 112(2)/318(4)/267 of the BNS, 2023.
¶3The gist of accusation against the present petitioners, in brief, are that on
20.10.2024, one Kajal Tanti had lodged an FIR before the Officer-in-Charge of Udalguri Police Station, inter-alia, alleging that the petitioners and the accused persons named in the FIR, have organized a lottery in the name of development of Bhima Sankar Shiva Mandir located at No. 1, Sapkhaiti and it is alleged that they have cheated the purchaser of the lotteries by falsely declaring the results on 20.10.2024. It is also alleged that the petitioners have embezzled crores of rupees by announcing fake results.
¶4The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the allegations levelled in the FIR against the present petitioner are not true. She submits that the results of the lottery were declared duly on 20.10.2024.
¶5It is also submitted that the petitioners are ready to cooperate with the investigation.
¶6I have considered the submissions at the bar. I have also scrutinised the Page No.# 3/3 case dairy. The petitioners have appeared before the Investigating Officer and they have co-operated with the investigation. The petitioners have not violated any bail conditions.
¶7Considering all aspects, the interim order dated 11.11.2024 is hereby made absolute under the same terms and conditions.
¶8Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010235752024 ooooooo undefined ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/2956/2024o RAMLALoRAJBHARoANDo2oORSo S/OoBISHWANATHoRAJBHARo R/OoNO.o1oSAPKHAITIoBHER,oUDALGURIo DIST.oUDALGURI,oASSAMo PIN-784509 2:oMITHUoRAJBHAR oS/OoJHAGARUoRAJBHARo R/OoNO.o1oSAPKHAITIoBHER o UDALGURIo DIST.oUDALGURI oASSAMo PIN-784509 3:oJOSEPHoBASAUMATARI oS/OLT.oPRAKASHoBASUMATARIo R/OoNO.o1oSAPKHAITIoBHER oUDALGURIo DIST.oUDLAGURI oASSAMo PIN-78450o VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REPoBYoTHEoLD.oPP,oASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oAoBHATTACHARYA,oMRoSoPAUL,MS.oKoMALAKAR,MR.oAo BHATTACHARJEEo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAM,oo Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.