VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Anjana Ghosh v. The State of Assam and 3 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
12 November 2024
Bench
Michael Zothankhumaauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 5897/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 13.11.2024

Heard Ms. B. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. K. Gogoi, learned counsel for all the respondents.

¶2The petitioner has averred that she is the registered owner of four vehicles, bearing registration nos. (i) AS-24/C-1407, (ii) AS-01/CC-7100, (iii) AS-01/CC-4629 and (iv) AS-01/GC-1983. The petitioner has further stated that those four vehicles were hired by the office of the respondent no. 4 on different occasions and after such hiring, they were released later. The petitioner had submitted bills towards hiring charges in respect of the four vehicles to the respondent authorities. As the amount of Rs.42,32,251/- raised through those bills, have not yet been disbursed to the petitioner by the respondent authorities despite repeated requests, the petitioner has preferred the writ petition.

¶3The petitioner's counsel submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has been paid Rs.7,10,325/- and as such, the balance amount payable to the petitioner is Rs.35,21,458/-.

¶4Mr. K. Gogoi, learned counsel for the respondents submits that in terms of the affidavit filed by the respondent No. 3, the petitioner is to be given the outstanding balance amount of Rs. 35,21,458/-.

¶5I have heard the learned counsels for the parties.

¶6The extract of para 4 of the affidavit-in-opposition filed by the respondent No. 3 is to the following effect:- Page No.# 3/3 "The Deponent further begs to mention herein that from the scrutiny of the above noted bills, it is found that the Petitioner has submitted an excess claim of Rs. 468/- (Rupees Forty Sixty Eight) only. The actual daim of the Petitioner is Rs.42,31,783/- (Rupees Forty Two Lakh Thirty One Thousand Seven Hundred Eighty Three) only out of which an amount of Rs.7,10,325/-(Rupees Seven Lakh Ten Thousand Three Hundred Twenty Five) has already been paid to the Petitioner. The proposal in respect of the remaining amount of Rs. 35,21,458 as stated above has already been forwarded to the office of the Director General of Police, Assam to accord sanction and allotment of the fund to make payment to the Petitioner. The Deponent also begs to state that as soon as sanction and allotment of fund is received from the authority, the same will be credited to the bank account of the petitioner."

¶7In view of the respondents admitting that they are liable to pay to the petitioner Rs.35,21,458/-, which has been sent to the office of the DGP, Assam, for according sanction and allotment of funds, the respondents are directed to pay to the petitioner the admitted amount, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

¶8The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010225672023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/5897/2023o ANJANAoGHOSHo W/O-oRAJENDRAoKUMARoGHOSH,o R/O-oH.NO-28.oMLoBARUAHoLANE,o SILPUKHURI,oGUWAHATI-03 VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo3oORSo REP.oBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARY,oTOoTHEoGOVERNMENTo OFoASSAM,oHOMEoDEPARTMENT,o oDISPUR,oGUWAHATI-6.oASSAM 2:THEoDIRECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICEo oASSAMoASSAMoPOLICEoHEADQUARTERS oULUBARIoGUWAHATI-07 3:THEoCOMMISSIONERoOFoPOLICE oKAMRUPo(M) GUWAHATI-01oASSAM 4:THEoMOTORoTRANSPORToOFFICER oOFFICEoOFoTHEoDIRECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICEo oASSAMoPOLICEoHEADQUARTERS oULUBARI oGUWAHATI-0o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoJoKoBhuyan,oMRoGoBHARADWAJ,MSoBoGOGOIo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oGA,oASSAM,oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.