- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 20 October 2024
- Bench
- Manish Choudhury
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 3098/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 21.10.2024 Heard Mr. B. Islam, learned counsel for the applicant; Mr. K. Gogoi, learned Central Government Counsel [CGC] for the opposite party no. 1; Mr. H. Sarma, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the opposite party no. 2; and Mr. J. Roy, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. B.P. Sarma, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 3 & 4. Also heard Mr. P.K. Munir, learned counsel for the writ petitioner in the accompanying writ petition, WP[C] no. 631/2014.
¶2The instant interlocutory application is preferred by the applicant seeking his impleadment as a party-respondent in the accompanying writ petition, WP[C] no. 631/2014.
¶3The subject-matter of the writ petition pertains to non-disbursal of an amount of Rs. 13,66,729/- plus interest, against acquisition of the Right of User with regard to a plot of land, covered by Dag no. 387 & Patta no. 79, at Village – Sonapur, Sonapur Revenue Circle, District – Kamrup [M] ['the subject-plot'] as per the provisions of the Petroleum and Mineral Pipeline [Acquisition of Right of User in Land] Act, 1962. The claim of one Gunu Ali for the assessed compensation amount for the subject-plot was rejected by the Competent Authority on 19.07.2024.
¶4The present interlocutory application is found to have been filed without impleading the writ petitioner as an opposite party. Page No.# 3/3
¶5Mr. B. Islam, learned counsel for the applicant, Gunu Ali has sought leave of the Court to withdraw the instant interlocutory application with the submission that the applicant would approach the appropriate forum seeking his relief.
¶6In view of the above submission made by Mr. Islam, the instant application stands dismissed on withdrawal.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010204802024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/3098/2024o GUNUoALIo@oMOHSINoALIo S/O-LT.oAKBORoALI,o R/OoVILLAGEoANDoP.O.oSONAPUR,oDISTRICToKAMRUPo(METRO),oASSAM VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo3oORSo REP.oBYoTHEoSECRETARYo,oMINISTRYoOFoPETROLEUMoANDoNATURALoGAS ,oGOVT.oOFoINDIA,oSHASTRIoBHAWANo,oDR.oRAJENDRAoPRASADoROADo,o PIN-110001,oNEWoDELHI 2:THEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONERo oGHY- oPIN-781001o DIST-oKAMRUPo(M) 3:THEoDIRECTORo oINDRADHANUSHoGASoGRIDoLTD o7THoFLOOR o122Ao oNRLoCENTRE oCHRISTIANoBASTI oASSAMo oGHYo oPIN-781006o. 4:THEoCOMPETENToAUTHORITYo oASSAMo oINDRADHANUSHoGASoGRIDoLTD. oBLOCK-D o3RDoFLOORo Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM SCRETARIAT DISPUR GHY PIN-78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MD B ISLAM,MR S HUSSAIN,MR. S S AHMED,S SULTANA Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., MR. P K MUNIR,G. A. ASSAM,MR B P SARMAH (r-3) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.