- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 22 October 2024
- Bench
- Robin Phukan
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 3135/2024
Judgment
ORDER
23.10.2024
Heard Mr. R.P. Kakoti, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. A.B. Dey, learned counsel for the applicants.
¶2This interlocutory application, under Order XLI Rule 5 of the C.P.C., is preferred by the applicants for staying operation of the Judgment and Decree dated 12.02.2021, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Karimganj, in Title Appeal No. 34/2019.
¶3It is to be noted here that vide impugned Judgment and Decree dated 12.02.2021, the learned Civil Judge, Karimganj has upheld the Judgment and Decree dated 23.04.2019, passed by the learned Munsiff No. 1, in Title Suit No. 107/2022.
¶4Mr. Kakoti, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicants submits that one execution petition has been filed before the learned trial court, but the same has not been proceeded. As such, the second appeal has been filed and the same has already been admitted and the notice has also been issued. Therefore, Mr. Kakoti contends that till disposal of the second appeal operation of the impugned Judgment and Decree dated 12.02.2021, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Karimganj, in Title Appeal No. 34/2019, may be stayed.
¶5Having considered the submission of learned counsel for the Page No.# 3/3 applicants and also considered the given facts and circumstances on the record, this court is inclined to allow this interlocutory application.
¶6Accordingly, it is provided that the operation of the Judgment and Decree dated 12.02.2021, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Karimganj, in Title Appeal No. 34/2019, stands stayed, till disposal of the RSA No. 58/2024.
¶7In terms of above, this I.A. stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010200782024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/3135/2024o MANAGER,oLONGAIoTEAoESTATEoANDoANR.o POoCHANDKHIRA,oPSoPATHARKANDI,oDISToKARIMGANJ,oASSAM 2:oASSAMoTEAoCORPORATIONoLTD. oREPRESENTEDoBYoITSoMANAGINGoDIRECTOR oREGISTEREDoOFFICEoAToHOUSEFEDoCOMPLEX oBASISTHAoROAD oDISPURoGUWAHATIo781006oASSAo VERSUSo D.M.oPRORERTIESoPVT.oLTD.oANDo2oORS.o -oAoCOMPANYoINCORPORATEDoUNDERoTHEoCOMPANIESoACTo1956oHAVING ITSoREGISTEREDoOFFICEoAToCONTINENTALoCHAMBER,o4THoFLOORo15oAo HEMANTAoBASUoSARANI,oKOLKATA,oWESToBENGAL,oREPRESENTEDoBYo CONSTITUTEDoATTORNEYoSHRIoMAHENDRAoPRATAPoSINGH,oMANAGER,o PATHINIoTEAoESTATE, 2:MANAGER oPATHINIoTEAoESTATE oSHRIoMAHENDRAoPRATAPoSINGH oAGEDo58oYEARS oS/OoLATEoBIKRAMAoSINGHA oRESIDINGoAToPATHINIoTEAoESTATE oPOoCHANDKHIRA oPSoPATHARKANDI oDISToKARIMGANJ oASSAM 3:MANTRIoTEAoCOMPANYoPVT.oLTD. oHAVINGoITSoREGISTEREDoOFFICEoATo15oA oHEMANTAoBASUoSORONI oKOLKATAo700001 oWESToBENGAo Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T DAS, MS. R BARMAN,MR. R P KAKOTI SR. ADV.,MR. T DAS,MR. S SUTRADHAR Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.