VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Raham Ali @ Raham Uddin v. The Union of India and 6 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
19 December 2024
Bench
Kalyan Rai Surana, Susmita Phukan Khaund
Case no.
I.A.(Civil) 3051/2024

Judgment

ORDER

20.12.2024 (K. R. Surana, J.) Heard Mr. D. P. Borah, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. B. Deka, learned CGC, appearing for respondent No. 1, Mr. G. Sharma, learned Standing Counsel Page No.# 3/5 for the Home Department and FT matters, Mr. H. Kuli, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A. I. Ali, learned counsel for the Election Commission of India, , and Mr. R. Talukdar, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State.

¶2The applicant is the writ petitioner in the connected writ petition

¶2This interlocutory application has been filed for bail by projecting that the applicant, namely, Raham Ali @ Raham Uddin was apprehended on 07.08.2024, pursuant to the opinion dated 30.11.2018,, passed by the learned Member, Foreigners' Tribunal No. 10th, Barpeta, at Bajali, Pathsala in FT Case No. 418/2016, arising out of IM(D)T Case No. 9796/98, by which the applicant was declared to be a foreigner of post

25.03.1971 stream.

¶3Pursuant to order dated 23.10.2024, passed by this Court in the connected writ petition, the record of the Tribunal was called for. The same is received. Perused the same for the purpose of considering this interlocutory application for bail.

¶4The materials available in the case record require further examination.

¶5The prayer for bail has been opposed by the learned Standing Counsel for the Home Department and FT matters, on the ground that the opinion was rendered by the learned Tribunal on 30.11.2018 and it has taken a lot of effort for the last 6 years for the District Administration and the Border Police to apprehend the applicant. Accordingly, it is submitted that in the event the applicant is released on bail, there is every likelihood of absconding. Page No.# 4/5

¶6Be that as it may, as the applicant has spent more than 3 (three) months in custody, this Court is of the considered opinion that the applicant may be released on the following conditions:-

i) The family members of the applicant shall appear before the Superintendent of Police (Border), Barpeta and furnish bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) with 2 (two) solvent sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the said authority.

ii) Before releasing the applicant on bail, the Superintendent of Police (Border), Barpeta shall obtain the biometrics of the iris of both eyes, the fingerprints of both hands and the photographs of the petitioner.

iii) The said authority shall also obtain necessary information and documentation as required under the Rules from the applicant for securing his presence.

¶7Thereafter, steps shall be taken by the Superintendent of Police (Border), Barpeta, to have the applicant released from the detention centre within 3 (three) working days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶8As a further condition of bail, the applicant is directed not to leave the territorial jurisdiction of Superintendent of Police (Border), Barpeta, without prior written intimation to the said authority, failing which, it would be open to the Superintendent of Police (Border), Barpeta, to move this Court for cancellation of bail. Page No.# 5/5

¶9Accordingly, this interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010173362024 ooooooo undefined ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:ooI.A.(Civil)/3051/2024 RAHAMoALIo@oRAHAMoUDDIN SONoOFo-oLATEoMOSLEMoUDDINo RESIDENToOFoVILLAGE-oSATBOINIRTOPo P.O.-oKALAHAoBHANGAo P.S.-oBARPETAoROADo DISTRICT-oBARPETAo(ASSAM)o PIN-o781315. oVERSUS THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo6oORS REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEo MINISTRYoOFoHOMEoAFFAIRS oGOVERNMENToOFoINDIA oNEWoDELHI-1. 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEo GOVERNMENToOFoASSAM o HOMEoDEPARTMENT oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-6. o3:THEoDIRECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICE oASSAM ULUBARI oGUWAHATI-6. o4:THEoSTATEoCO-ORDINATOR oNATIONALoREGISTERoOFoCITIZENSo(NRC) oASSAM ACHYUToPLAZA Page No.# 2/5 BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-5. 5:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER BELTOLA- BASISTHA ROAD HOUSEFED COMPLEX GUWAHATI-6 ASSAM. 6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BARPETA P.O.- BARPETA DISTRICT- BARPETA (ASSAM) PIN- 781301. 7:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B) BARPETA P.O.- BARPETA DISTRICT- BARPETA (ASSAM) PIN- 781301. ------------ Advocate for : MR. D P BORAH Advocate for : DY.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.