VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Rovi Roi v. The State of Assam and Anr

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
23 September 2024
Bench
S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 2353/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 24-09-2024 Heard Mr. D. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioner Rovi Roi, who has filed this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with prayer for bail as he is behind bars since 20.07.2024 in connection with Latasil Police Station Case No. 76/2024 under Section 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

¶2Heard Mr. D. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent State and Mr. S. Munir, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.

¶3It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the victim is a major and she is not a minor and a false case has been brought up under Section 6 of the POCSO Act.

¶4The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner promised to marry the victim but he has cheated the victim and the victim who was impregnated by the petitioner, gave birth to a male child.

¶5Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the victim has not attained majority and while she gave her statement under Section 164 of CrPC she has stated that she is 17 (Seventeen) years old.

¶6I have scrutinized The Case Diary. I have also considered the submission that the petitioner is willing to cooperate with the investigation.

¶7Considering all aspects, I deem it proper to grant bail to the petitioner. Page No.# 3/3 The petitioner is enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Kamrup (M) under the conditions that :

(i) the petitioner shall cooperate with the remaining part of investigation,

(ii) the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on every fortnight till completion of investigation,

(iii) the petitioner shall not leave jurisdiction of the Court without prior permission.

¶8On breach of any of the bail conditions, bail order shall automatically stand cancelled.

¶9In terms of the above observation, this Bail Application stands disposed of.

¶10Send back the Case Diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010160342024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oBailoAppln./2353/2024o ROVIoROIo S/OoPAWANoRAIo R/OoUZANBAZAR,oPADUMPUKHURIo P.S.oLATASIL,oGUWAHATIo DIST.oKAMRUPo(METRO),oASSAM VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDoANR.o REPoBYoTHEoPP,,oASSAM 2:XXXXXoINFORMANT oD/OoDEORAJoBASFORE o UZANBAZAR oPADUMPUKHURIo P.S.oLATASIL oGUWAHATIo DIST.oKAMRUPo(METRO) o ASSAM oPIN-78100o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oAoCHAUDHURY,oMR.oDoBORA,MR.oNoMAHAJAN,MR.oPoKo DASo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAM,oMR.oSoMUNIR(INFORMANT),MR.oCoKo NATH(INFORMANT)oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.