VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Tridip Ranjan Maulik v. The State of Assam and 3 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
23 September 2024
Bench
Lanusungkum Jamirauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 3904/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 24.09.2024

Heard Mr. Z. Hammad, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S. Chutia, learned standing counsel, Elementary Education Department for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Mr. G. Pegu, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent No.4. The mother of the petitioner late Kanan Bala Mondal while serving as Assistant Teacher, 1 No. Pataliati L.P. School in the district of Nagaon, died-in-harness on 18.07.2015. Thereafter, the petitioner made an application for appointment on compassionate ground on 18.08.2015. The District Level Committee in its meeting held on 14.12.2016 considered the case of the petitioner. However, his case was not recommended due to want of vacancy. The District Level Committee, Nagaon again considered the case of the petitioner in its meeting held on 15.05.2017. However, his case could not be recommended due to want of adequate vacancy. Being aggrieved, petitioner is before this Court by way of the present writ petition. Clause-15 of the O.M dated 1st of June, 2015, issued by the Department of Personnel (B) provides that if sufficient vacancies are not available in any particular office to accommodate the persons in the waiting list for compassionate appointment it is open to the Administrative Department/Offices to take up the matter with other Departments/Offices of the Government to Page No.# 3/3 provide an early appointment on compassionate grounds to those in the waiting list. A perusal of the meeting minutes dated 14.12.2016 and 15.05.2017 of the District Level Committee, Nagaon clearly indicates that the Committee failed to apply Clause-15 of the O.M dated 01.06.2015 while considering the case of the petitioner. Accordingly, the matter is remanded back to the concerned DLC to reconsider the case of the petitioner in terms of Clause-15 of the O.M dated

01.06.2015 in its next immediate sitting. With the above observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010152892024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/3904/2024o TRIDIPoRANJANoMAULIKo S/O-oLATEoKANANoBALAoMANDAL,oVILL.-oPATALIoATI,oP.O.oBHARIDHOWA,o DIST.oNAGAON,oASSAM,oPIN-o782120. VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo3oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.o OFoASSAM,oELEMENTARYoEDUCATIONoDEPARTMENT,oDISPUR,o GUWAHATI-6. 2:THEoDIRECTOR oELEMENTARYoEDUCATIONoDEPARTMENT oASSAM oKAHILIPARA oGUWAHATI-19. 3:THEoDISTRICToELEMENTARYoEDUCATIONoOFFICER oNAGAON oP.O. oP.S.oANDoDIST.oNAGAON oASSAM 4:THEoCHAIRMAN oDISTRICToLEVELoCOMMITTEE o(FORoCOMPASSIONATEoAPPOINTMENT)oNAGAONoREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEo DEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER oNAGAON oP.O.oANDoDIST.oNAGAON oASSAo AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oZoHAMMAD,o Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, ELEM. EDU BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.