- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 11 November 2024
- Bench
- Michael Zothankhuma
- Case no.
- WP(C) 2178/2017
Judgment
ORDER Date : 12.11.2024
Mr. S. Das, learned counsel appears for the petitioners, while Mr. K. M. Hassan, learned counsel appears for the respondent No. 2 and Mr. K. Gogoi, learned counsel appears for the respondent No. 1.
¶2Mr. S. Das, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent No. 2 has been paid all his entitlements, in terms of the Award dated
16.08.2016 passed by the learned Labour Court, Guwahati in Case No. 4/2015. He accordingly submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
¶3Mr. K. M. Hassan, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2, on the other hand, submits that he does not have any instructions as to whether the respondent No. 2 (workman) has received all his entitlements. He submits that the writ petition can be closed, on the condition that the writ petitioners issues a letter to the respondent No. 2, indicating the payments made to the respondent No.2, in terms of the Award dated 16.08.2016 passed by the learned Labour Court.
¶4Mr. S. Das, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petitioners will issue a letter to the respondent No. 2 or his counsel, indicating the payments made to the respondent No. 2, in terms of the Award dated
16.08.2016 passed in Case No. 4/2015, within one month from the date of closure of this case.
¶5In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels for the parties, Page No.# 3/3 the present writ petition stands closed, with a direction being given to the writ petitioners to give a letter to the respondent No. 2 or his counsel, indicating the payments made to the respondent No. 2, in terms of the Award dated
16.08.2016 passed in Case No. 4/2015, within a month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010126752017 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/2178/2017o THEoGUWAHATIoREFINERYoEMPLOYEEoCO-OPERATIVEoSOCIETYoLTD.oando 2oORS.,oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCHAIRMANo VIZ.oSRIoJANIKoBARMAN,o NOONMATI,oGUWAHATI-20. 2:oRUDRAoBAHADURoCHETRI oS/O.oLT.oBASUDEVoCHETRI. 3:oBIMANoCHANDRAoKALITA oEMPLOYEEoOFoGUWAHATIoREFINERYoLTD. oBOTHoAREoRESIDENToOFoNOONMATI oGUWAHATIoREFINERY oGUWAHATI-781020o VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoandoANR.o LABOURoandoWELFAREoDEPTT.,o REP.oBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoandoSECRETARY,o DEPTT.oOFoLABOUR,oDISPUR,oGUWAHATI-781006 2:BANGSHIoDHARoHALOI oHOUSEoNO.o18 oBIJOYoNAGAR oNOONMATI oGUWAHATI-781020o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMS.RoToDAS,oMR.KoDAS,MR.HoGOGOI,MR.SoDAS,MR.No BARUAHo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oMR.RoSARMAR-2,oGA,oASSAM,MR.NoKoHALOI(R-2),MSBo DEVI(R-2),MS.KoDoSARMAH(R-2),MR.oKoMoHASSANoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.