- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 12 November 2024
- Bench
- Manish Choudhury
- Case no.
- WP(C) 2179/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 13.11.2024 Heard Mr. S. Alim, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. D. Deka, learned Standing Counsel, Assam Information Commission for the respondent no. 1; and Ms. M. Barman, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 2 & 3.
¶2The petitioner preferred an application under Section 6 of the Right to Information [RTI] Act, 2005 seeking certain information. The petitioner has stated that after preferring a first appeal under Section 19[1] of the RTI Act, 2005 and not receiving any reply, he approached the Assam Information Commission by presenting an application dated
14.02.2023, highlighting his grievances in respect of the information he sought for from the Public Information Officer.
¶3This writ petition is preferred seeking inter alia a writ in the nature of mandamus for a direction to the respondent authorities to furnish the required information to the petitioner in terms of the provision under Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005.
¶4Mr. Deka, learned Standing Counsel, Assam Information Commission for the respondent no. 1 has submitted that the Commission had received the application of the petitioner without the details as regards his approaches before the 1st Appellant Authority under Section 19[1] of the RTI Act, 2005. Moreover, the application was found not in proper form. The said application was, therefore, returned to the petitioner by an Order dated
15.12.2023.
¶5Mr. Alim, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has not received any Order dated 15.12.2023 from the Commission.
¶6If an applicant is aggrieved by the decision or indecision of the Public Information Page No.# 3/3 Officer and the 1st Appellant Authority, he has the option of approaching the State Information Commission by way of 2nd appeal under Section 19[3] of the RTI Act, 2005.
¶7Mr. Deka has submitted that if the petitioner approaches the Commission by way of a 2nd appeal in the proper form along with all the necessary documents in response to the Letter dated 15.12.2023, such 2nd appeal would be considered in accordance with law.
¶8In response to such submission made by the learned Standing Counsel, Assam Information Commission, Mr. Alim, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner will approach the Assam Information Commission by preferring a 2nd appeal under Section 19[3] of the RTI Act in proper form along with all the document relating to his approaches before the Public Information Officer and the 1st Appellate Authority.
¶9Taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, this court is of the considered view that instead of keeping this writ petition pending the same can be disposed of, by permitting the petitioner to approach the Assam Information Commission by preferring a 2nd appeal under Section 19[3] of the RTI Act, 2005 along with all the supporting documents relating to his approaches before the Public Information Officer and the 1st Appellate Authority. It is accordingly ordered. It is observed that in the event the petitioner prefers an appeal under Section 19[3] of the RTI Act, 2005 it is expected that the Assam Information Commission would consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law with utmost expedition.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010079332024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/2179/2024o MD.oABDULoKADIRo SONoOFoHANIFoUDDIN,oRESIDENToOFoVILLAGE-oKHOLABANDHA,oP.S.o KACHUMARA,oPIN-o781127,oDISTRICT-oBARPETA,oASSAM,oMOBILEoNO.o 9954283585 VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo3oORSo THROUGHoTHEoCHIEFoCOMMISSIONER,oASSAMoSTATEoINFORMATIONo COMMISSION,oPANJABARI,oGUWAHATI-o781037 2:DIRECTORoOFoFOODoANDoCIVILoSUPPLIESoANDoCONSUMERoAFFAIRS oBHANGAGARH oGUWAHATI-05 3:THEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONERoCUMoDISTRICToINFORMATIONoOFFICER oBARPETAoDISTRICT oP.O.oANDoP.S.oBARPETA oDISTRICT-oBARPETA oASSAM oPIN-o781301 4:THEoSECRETARY oDAKHINoBAGURIBARIoSAMABAYoSAMITIoLTD oP.O.oKHOLABANDHA oDISTRICT-oBARPETA oASSAM oPIN-o78112o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oMoHoANSARI,oMR.oSoALIMo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oGA,oASSAM,oMRoNoJoKUMAR(R-1),MRoDoDEKA(R-1)oo Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.