VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

M/S Himalayan Distillery Private Limited v. The State of Assam and 3 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
24 November 2024
Bench
Devashis Baruahauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 1665/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 25.11.2024

Mr. S. Banik, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. N. Goswami, the learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the Excise Department.

¶2Mr. S. Banik, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition the license has been renewed and the petitioner's apprehension is no longer there. Accordingly, the learned counsel submitted that he has instruction to withdraw the instant writ petition.

¶3In view of the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.

¶4Interim order, if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010061462023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/1665/2023o M/SoHIMALAYANoDISTILLERYoPRIVATEoLIMITEDo AMBERoGAON,o12THoMILE,oGSoROAD,oMOUZA-oSONAPUR,oDIST-oKAMRUP,o ASSAM,oREP.oBYoONEoOFoITSoDIRECTORS,o RISHANToBARUAH,oAGEDoABOUTo40oYRS,o S/O-oRAMoBARUAH,o R/OoHOUSEoNOo2,oLACHIToNAGAR,oBYEoLANEo9,oGUWAHATI-781007 VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo3oORSo REP.oBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM,o EXCISEoDEPARTMENT,oDISPUR,oGUWAHATI-6. 2:THEoADDL.oCOMMISSIONERoOFoEXCISE oASSAM oHOUSEFEDoCOMPLEX oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-6. 3:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoEXCISE oKAMRUP oASSAM oO/OoTHEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONERo oKAMRUPo(M) oGUWAHATIo(EXCISEoBRANCH) 4:THEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER oKAMRUPo(M) oGUWAHATIo oASSAo Page No.# 2/2 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. Banik, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N. Goswami, SC, Excise Department BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.